This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Skip to the content

Share this

Free weekly newswire

Sign up to receive all our latest news direct to your inbox.

Physics on film

100 Second Science Your scientific questions answered simply by specialists in less than 100 seconds.

Watch now

Bright Recruits

At all stages of your career – whether you're an undergraduate, graduate, researcher or industry professional – brightrecruits.com can help find the job for you.

Find your perfect job

Physics connect

Are you looking for a supplier? Physics Connect lists thousands of scientific companies, businesses, non-profit organizations, institutions and experts worldwide.

Start your search today

Blog

Freezing physics

LiquidNitrogen.jpg
Levitating a magnet using liquid nitrogen. (Credit: Yorick van Boheemen)

By Matin Durrani

Tucked away in the corner of the foyer at the RAI Convention Center in Amsterdam, where the 25th International Conference on Low-Temperature Physics has been taking place for the past week, I found a series of great little demonstrations by a group of students from the University of Leiden.

The students were showing highlights from a roadshow — dubbed “Freezing physics” — that they perform at about 120 schools and numerous science fairs around the Netherlands each year in an attempt to get people hooked on physics.

You won’t be surprised to find the usual “ooo, watch how this rubber band/tennis ball/banana goes really stiff when we dunk it into a bucket of liquid nitrogen” demonstrations, which are a staple of many public shows of this kind.

But the students, known collectively as the Rino Foundation, had some clever stuff up their sleeves too. One involved using the frozen banana to hammer a nail into a piece of wood. Another saw a hand-bell being cooled in liquid nitrogen and then rung after being frozen. As the material had stiffened considerably, the bell’s ring tone was much higher than when warm.

Fabulously named Rino president Yorick van Boheemen then dipped a blown-up balloon into the nitrogen, which led to the balloon shrinking as the pressure fell until it was so cold that a puddle of liquid air had collected at the bottom. In another demo, he put a beaker with liquid nitrogen in a chamber, pumped the air out, which allowed the nitrogen to boil much more easily. The remaining nitrogen liquid then got so cool that it solidified.

Yorick also tipped a load of liquid nitrogen into a kettle with hot water. The steam condensed so fast that it created beautiful clouds that poured out all over the table.

But what stole the show was the “Human Levitator”, which contained a liquid-nitrogen-cooled superconducting YBCO disk. Roughly 30 cm in diameter, it was placed beneath a 1.5 T disk-shaped neodymium permanent magnet of the same diameter that levitated as the magnetic field can not enter the superconductor, except down thin channels called flux bundles.

Yorick explained that the magnet could support a mass of up to 300 kg, which meant that there was a steady stream of willing LT25 delegates who could spin freely just by standing on it. Each person was then given a pair of dumb-bells to hold in their outstretched arms. Bring your arms in and you start to spin faster. It’s the conservation of angular momentum of course: obvious stuff for any physicist — but nothing beats trying it out like this.

At their shows to schools, pupils have to make do with a smaller scale version. Which is interesting, but not quite the same as being able to stand on the levitating magnet.

So well done to conference organiser Peter Kes from the University of Leiden for bringing the students to the world’s low-temperature community.

This entry was posted in LT25 low-temperature conference 2008. Bookmark the permalink.
View all posts by this author  | View this author's profile

2 comments

  1. Alastair Carnegie

    “…conservation of angular momentum of course: obvious stuff for any physicist…”
    I would just like to add, that when confronted with the ‘obvious’ folk often look no further. Not many physicists ask the “What?”, “Why?” and “How?” of the conservation of angular momentum. They may have a stock textbook answer, but do they understand the significance? We are into Higgs territory here, what is the cause of ‘inertia’? What ‘axioms’ are NOT applicable to angular momentum? Why are they not applicable? What is the significance of the exclusion? Which Law of Physics does not apply?…..Discover that a Law of Physics is in need of ‘restriction’ and a Nobel Prize is a real possibility. By universal popular demand, not just from one’s peers, who may feel a little guilty, if not stupid, at not spotting a deeper ‘obvious’ behind the ‘manifest obvious’.

  2. maury sweetin

    I’m confused about whether water freezing will burst water pipe open at both ends with only a gentle “slump” from level, where wqter can accumulate. Will the freezing expand to press against the pipe, or merely expand horizontally, thus not causing stress on the pipe ?

Leave a comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Guidelines

  • Comments should be relevant to the article and not be used to promote your own work, products or services.
  • Please keep your comments brief (we recommend a maximum of 250 words).
  • We reserve the right to remove excessively long, inappropriate or offensive entries.

Show/hide formatting guidelines

Tag Description Example Output
<a> Hyperlink <a href="http://www.google.com">google</a> google
<abbr> Abbreviation <abbr title="World Health Organisation" >WHO</abbr> WHO
<acronym> Acronym <acronym title="as soon as possible">ASAP</acronym> ASAP
<b> Bold <b>Some text</b> Some text
<blockquote> Quoted from another source <blockquote cite="http://iop.org/">IOP</blockquote>
IOP
<cite> Cite <cite>Diagram 1</cite> Diagram 1
<del> Deleted text From this line<del datetime="2012-12-17"> this text was deleted</del> From this line this text was deleted
<em> Emphasized text In this line<em> this text was emphasised</em> In this line this text was emphasised
<i> Italic <i>Some text</i> Some text
<q> Quotation WWF goal is to build a future <q cite="http://www.worldwildlife.org/who/index.html">
where people live in harmony with nature and animals</q>
WWF goal is to build a future
where people live in harmony with nature and animals
<strike> Strike text <strike>Some text</strike> Some text
<strong> Stronger emphasis of text <strong>Some text</strong> Some text
WordPress Appliance - Powered by TurnKey Linux