This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Skip to the content

Share this

Free weekly newswire

Sign up to receive all our latest news direct to your inbox.

Physics on film

100 Second Science Your scientific questions answered simply by specialists in less than 100 seconds.

Watch now

Bright Recruits

At all stages of your career – whether you're an undergraduate, graduate, researcher or industry professional – can help find the job for you.

Find your perfect job

Physics connect

Are you looking for a supplier? Physics Connect lists thousands of scientific companies, businesses, non-profit organizations, institutions and experts worldwide.

Start your search today


Space fair starts with a shower

By Michael Banks

The weather was dry as I arrived yesterday at the armadillo-shaped congress centre in Glasgow for the 59th International Astronautical Congress (IAC). But there was no need for delegates to ask what the weather forecast would be for the rest of the week. Even before I had had the chance to register, I had already picked up two conference freebies. They were both umbrellas.

The IAC is a huge global meeting at which the international space industry and national space agencies come together to show their wares and find out what everyone is up to. In the afternoon, just as the first rain clouds were opening up, the heads of national agencies came together for a briefing session. NASA boss Mike Griffin was joined on the panel by other space-agency chiefs such as ROSCOSMOS deputy head Alexander Medvedchikov from Russia, the Chinese National Space Administration’s boss Sun Laiyan, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency head Keji Tachikawa as well as Byrana Suresh, director of the Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology.

Each gave a four-minute briefing of progress in their respective national programmes, before a question-and-answer session with delegates. Griffin went first, explaining that he expected that NASA would continue to use the $100bn International Space Station (ISS) even when the space-shuttle programme finishes in 2010. He also noted that Congress had voted to allow the US to buy places on board Russian Soyuz craft to fulfil their ongoing obligations to the ISS.

Co-operation appears to be this year’s buzzword at the annual space bash. Griffin indicated that the US would send astronauts to the moon by 2020 with “international co-operation”. But speaking through an interpreter, China’s Laiyan was more subdued on the co-operation front for future manned space missions to the Moon. The Chinese also expect to have “their own” orbiting space station by 2011, which will be the launch pad for a manned mission to Moon. “The Moon mission has priority to China,” says Laiyan.

Medvedchikov was much vaguer about Russia’s space programme, but when asked about co-operation noted that countries have their own ways of operating. He also expected no co-operation when it comes to defence-related areas of space, which may have been a remark aimed at the US’s plans to install a missile defense shield on Russia’s doorstep.

Conference organizers are pretty strict about whose questions get asked — delegates have to fill in a form first and state explicitly who the query is aimed at. I chose to ask Laiyan if he wanted China to beat the US in the race back to the Moon but, for some reason, my question remained unanswered. The organizers, sadly, opted instead for less controversial stuff from other delegates — like “How do you become a Canadian astronaut?” and “When will the first women be sent to Mars?” It was an opportunity missed.

This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.
View all posts by this author  | View this author's profile

One comment to Space fair starts with a shower

  1. Ender

    Manned space flights = good engineering but poor science. A lot more has been learnt about the solar system, and the impact of solar weather on our planet in the past decades from robotic spaceships, than from all the manned missions.
    I can undersand how manned missions catch the imagination of the general public, and I can also understand how it stretches the boundaries of engineering, but they are of little use from the scientific point of view, and what’s worse, it draws funds from valid scientific projects. Wouldn’t we like to know more about Jupiter and Saturn’s moons, for instance?


  • Comments should be relevant to the article and not be used to promote your own work, products or services.
  • Please keep your comments brief (we recommend a maximum of 250 words).
  • We reserve the right to remove excessively long, inappropriate or offensive entries.

Show/hide formatting guidelines

Tag Description Example Output
<a> Hyperlink <a href="">google</a> google
<abbr> Abbreviation <abbr title="World Health Organisation" >WHO</abbr> WHO
<acronym> Acronym <acronym title="as soon as possible">ASAP</acronym> ASAP
<b> Bold <b>Some text</b> Some text
<blockquote> Quoted from another source <blockquote cite="">IOP</blockquote>
<cite> Cite <cite>Diagram 1</cite> Diagram 1
<del> Deleted text From this line<del datetime="2012-12-17"> this text was deleted</del> From this line this text was deleted
<em> Emphasized text In this line<em> this text was emphasised</em> In this line this text was emphasised
<i> Italic <i>Some text</i> Some text
<q> Quotation WWF goal is to build a future <q cite="">
where people live in harmony with nature and animals</q>
WWF goal is to build a future
where people live in harmony with nature and animals
<strike> Strike text <strike>Some text</strike> Some text
<strong> Stronger emphasis of text <strong>Some text</strong> Some text