This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Skip to the content

Share this

Free weekly newswire

Sign up to receive all our latest news direct to your inbox.

Physics on film

100 Second Science Your scientific questions answered simply by specialists in less than 100 seconds.

Watch now

Bright Recruits

At all stages of your career – whether you're an undergraduate, graduate, researcher or industry professional – brightrecruits.com can help find the job for you.

Find your perfect job

Physics connect

Are you looking for a supplier? Physics Connect lists thousands of scientific companies, businesses, non-profit organizations, institutions and experts worldwide.

Start your search today

Blog

What do they think at CERN?

angels.jpg
Far too much antimatter — and her hair looks too thick and shiny to be believable

By Hamish Johnston

No, not about the Austrian pull-out — Angels and Demons of course.

The BBC sent a reporter to Geneva for a special screening last night of the film Angels and Demons for CERN physicists.

The film — based on a book by Dan Brown — involves a plot to destroy the Vatican using anti-matter produced at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider.

The LHC does produce antimatter, but one CERN physicist told the BBC it would take ten times the age of the universe to accumulate enough antimatter to do the dastardly deed.

The Vatican is of course in the Eternal City, so perhaps the plotters have time on their side.

What did the physicists think of the rest of the film? You can listen to their comments here

By the way, 13,381 folks have signed the online petition to keep Austria at CERN.

This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.
View all posts by this author  | View this author's profile

5 comments

  1. I’m glad to see the comments aren’t too negative – we scientists sometimes overlook the importance of artistic license in creative works.
    However, it seems to me that a lot of scientists worldwide are missing the point – the central theme of the film (and book) is not the idea of an antimatter bomb, but the relationship between science and religion – an interesting theme for a blockbuster. Hence I think lectures planned to accompany the film (see blog) should tackle this subject..

  2. Ender

    The problem is that such “licences” only help to spread ignorance among the general public. Brown is entertaining and I would add that he even drops some interesting facts here and there. Sometimes you can even call him thought provoking. Yet he makes such huge blunders that the final result is mediocre (Diving into the Tevere from a helicopter hudreds of meters high, and ending unharmed?? Come on!!). Good read for a rainy Sunday afrenoon, though, as I wrote elesewhere.

  3. pjrowe

    What bothers me the most is that the book sold so well and that people find this sort of material ‘good reading’
    But from the viewpoint of an educator, if it helps literacy…!!

  4. Re “The problem is that such “licences” only help to spread ignorance among the general public”,if the film causes people to inquire more about the topic, then it spreads knowledge, not ignorance. This is of course the great debate concerning science in the media – spreading misinformatio vs raising awareness..

  5. Ender

    I understand your point, although I’m not quite convinced. I think public awareness of scince should come out of better sources than sensationalistic movies, although I understand that these kind of movies are meant to entertain rather than to educate. By the way, did you know that, while Spiderman II brought fusion energy to public awareness, its budget was greaterr than the American fusion programme?

Leave a comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Guidelines

  • Comments should be relevant to the article and not be used to promote your own work, products or services.
  • Please keep your comments brief (we recommend a maximum of 250 words).
  • We reserve the right to remove excessively long, inappropriate or offensive entries.

Show/hide formatting guidelines

Tag Description Example Output
<a> Hyperlink <a href="http://www.google.com">google</a> google
<abbr> Abbreviation <abbr title="World Health Organisation" >WHO</abbr> WHO
<acronym> Acronym <acronym title="as soon as possible">ASAP</acronym> ASAP
<b> Bold <b>Some text</b> Some text
<blockquote> Quoted from another source <blockquote cite="http://iop.org/">IOP</blockquote>
IOP
<cite> Cite <cite>Diagram 1</cite> Diagram 1
<del> Deleted text From this line<del datetime="2012-12-17"> this text was deleted</del> From this line this text was deleted
<em> Emphasized text In this line<em> this text was emphasised</em> In this line this text was emphasised
<i> Italic <i>Some text</i> Some text
<q> Quotation WWF goal is to build a future <q cite="http://www.worldwildlife.org/who/index.html">
where people live in harmony with nature and animals</q>
WWF goal is to build a future
where people live in harmony with nature and animals
<strike> Strike text <strike>Some text</strike> Some text
<strong> Stronger emphasis of text <strong>Some text</strong> Some text
WordPress Appliance - Powered by TurnKey Linux