German aces Credit: Bernie Hengst
By James Dacey
How does one compare the achievements of Nobel Prize winning physicists?
Well, a couple of researchers at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) believe it can be done – look a physicist’s cyber-presence.
Number of published papers – journals publish all sorts of nonsense.
Number of citations – “multiplicate by mere copying”.
They go on to propose a third way based on a previous study of theirs
Back in 2006, these two electrical engineers published a paper demonstrating that fame of German World War I fighter pilots (measured as number of Google hits) grows exponentially with their achievement (number of victories).
In this latest arXiv paper Simkin and Roychowdhury have turned their method on its head by measuring scientific ‘achievement’ by the number of Google hits a physicist receives.
They ran Google searches for all 45 pre-WWII Nobel Laureates in Physics, and translated this into achievement using a simple logarithm.
Unsurprisingly, Einstein is the biggest cyber celeb – his 22,700,000 Google hits give him an achievement score of “1 Einstein”. Second was Max Planck whose 10,600,000 rate his achievement as 0.911 Einsteins. Third was Marie Curie scoring 0.850 Einsteins.
Just missing out on the top ten is the UK’s Paul Dirac whose 255,000 hits give him a web presence just 1% that of Einstein’s but this rates his achievement as 0.48 Einsteins.
To round things up, Simkin and Raychowbury argue that their findings are backed up by the “recent attention given to studies where very many non-expert opinions lead to estimates agreeing with reality as good or better than expert opinions”.
Hmmm… that’s a little bit vague isn’t it! And aren’t they assuming that there is an absolute measure of scientific achievement?
So, readers of physicsworld.com, a question for you to ponder:
Can you think of a better / fairer / more useful way of comparing physicists’ achievements?