This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Skip to the content

Share this

Free weekly newswire

Sign up to receive all our latest news direct to your inbox.

Physics on film

100 Second Science Your scientific questions answered simply by specialists in less than 100 seconds.

Watch now

Bright Recruits

At all stages of your career – whether you're an undergraduate, graduate, researcher or industry professional – can help find the job for you.

Find your perfect job

Physics connect

Are you looking for a supplier? Physics Connect lists thousands of scientific companies, businesses, non-profit organizations, institutions and experts worldwide.

Start your search today


Canada and Japan threaten global climate deal, warns prominent policy-maker

Countdown to Copenhagen

By James Dacey

Canada and Japan pose a serious threat to achieving a planet-saving deal in Copenhagen this December, warned Sir David King, former Chief Science Advisor to the UK government, speaking yesterday at the World Conference of Science Journalists that is taking place in London this week.

He was, of course, referring to the UN Climate Change Conference, which is set to thrash out a successor to the Kyoto protocol when it reaches the end of its first stage in 2012.

The latest report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC concluded that global greenhouse-gas emissions will need to be cut by 80% of 1990 levels by 2050 if we are to ensure that global temperatures do not rise more than 2 degrees by the end of the century.

Over the course of two weeks in the Danish capital, officials from 192 nations will gather to address four main objectives:

1) Legally-binding targets – on carbon emissions;
2) Clarity on how developing countries should be expected to act;
3) Financing – how we going to cover the economic cost of maintaining acceptable living standards in low carbon societies; and
4) Governance structure – how the international community will work together to take the deal forward.

Yesterday in the UK capital, Sir David King urged the developed nations to “show their cards” now so we they can begin to formulate mitigation and adaptation plans in the lead up to December. “The debate has moved on – it is no longer a question of whether man-made climate change is happening but what to do about it”.

The former professor of physical chemistry at Cambridge University then went on to warn of a worrying shift in the positions of the Japanese and Canadian governments. King accused these nations of waning interest in tackling climate change, and attributed this to the recent scrapping of the role of chief scientist in both nations.

But when asked about the viability of mitigating climate change through large-scale geoengineering projects, King played his own cards surprisingly close to his chest:
“I am yet to be convinced that any of the existing options would be worth investing in, but I would like to see more research in this area.”

However, when pressed for his course of action in the event of an unsatisfactory result in Copenhagen, King did reveal a couple of back-up plans:

Plan B look for legal avenues that could stall the protocol from being implenented
Plan C lobby for a strong bilateral agreement between China and the US that could have the international clout to bring about a revision of the agreement.

“Obviously, I am a bit reluctant to discuss these options because it will appear that I am losing faith in plan A – which is by far the most desirable option,” he said.

This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.
View all posts by this author  | View this author's profile



    At least in Canada and Japan, skeptics of man made global warming are allowed to be heard. Here in Obamaland, with the Obamamedia, such voices are squelched and punished. should stay out of politics. Or at least, give voice to scientists on both sides of man made global warming issue.

  2. Doug Danhoff

    Thankyou Canada and Japan….Someone needs to stand in front of this runaway train. Those of you who have knowledge of radiation physics need no persuading that CO2 and its supossed positive feedback are incapable of causing warming. Those of you with paleo-geology or climatology backgrounds understand that positive feedback from CO2, if it existed would have long ago cooked our planet into a barren waste when CO2 levels were above 5000ppm.
    Hopefully some countries will keep dragging their feet until even the most fanatical believer in the AGW religion is convinced that we are intering a global minimum of the Dalton, or Maunder class.


    James Darcy, So it is OK for politicians to garner the support of money grabbing scientists and its OK for those who are skeptics to be ignored. That is not science that is politics. So sleep well James, you are doing your part to put over the greatest scam on the USA that was ever conceived; and it was conceived by that great scientist: ALGORE.,

  4. Peter Gill

    Folks if you download a copy of the draft Copenhagen Treaty (just google it) then should you be of a nervous disposition I would not recommend you look at paragraphs 36 and 38. Those ignoring this advice may first be shocked at the implied weapons of mass taxation that are planned for their wealth. As they read on and realise that a World Government is being formed with considerable powers and all this without any democratic votes anywhere.


  • Comments should be relevant to the article and not be used to promote your own work, products or services.
  • Please keep your comments brief (we recommend a maximum of 250 words).
  • We reserve the right to remove excessively long, inappropriate or offensive entries.

Show/hide formatting guidelines

Tag Description Example Output
<a> Hyperlink <a href="">google</a> google
<abbr> Abbreviation <abbr title="World Health Organisation" >WHO</abbr> WHO
<acronym> Acronym <acronym title="as soon as possible">ASAP</acronym> ASAP
<b> Bold <b>Some text</b> Some text
<blockquote> Quoted from another source <blockquote cite="">IOP</blockquote>
<cite> Cite <cite>Diagram 1</cite> Diagram 1
<del> Deleted text From this line<del datetime="2012-12-17"> this text was deleted</del> From this line this text was deleted
<em> Emphasized text In this line<em> this text was emphasised</em> In this line this text was emphasised
<i> Italic <i>Some text</i> Some text
<q> Quotation WWF goal is to build a future <q cite="">
where people live in harmony with nature and animals</q>
WWF goal is to build a future
where people live in harmony with nature and animals
<strike> Strike text <strike>Some text</strike> Some text
<strong> Stronger emphasis of text <strong>Some text</strong> Some text