This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Skip to the content

Share this

Free weekly newswire

Sign up to receive all our latest news direct to your inbox.

Physics on film

100 Second Science Your scientific questions answered simply by specialists in less than 100 seconds.

Watch now

Bright Recruits

At all stages of your career – whether you're an undergraduate, graduate, researcher or industry professional – brightrecruits.com can help find the job for you.

Find your perfect job

Physics connect

Are you looking for a supplier? Physics Connect lists thousands of scientific companies, businesses, non-profit organizations, institutions and experts worldwide.

Start your search today

Blog

Deep exploits – the search for dark matter

By Matin Durrani

There are some challenges in physics that are, quite simply, harder and more important than others.

Some will argue that the number one challenge is the search for the Higgs boson, the building of a practical quantum computer or the creation of a unified theory.

But for others, the biggest deal in physics is the search for dark matter – the invisible and so far elusive substance that is believed to make up more than 80% of the mass in the universe.

And what’s particularly hard about searching for dark matter is not just that it’s invisible, but that most people looking for it spend their days hundreds of metres below ground, often in mines.

There can’t be many physicists whose job involves travelling up and down lift shafts wearing a hard hat and a day-glo jacket, before brushing the dust off, entering a clean room and then trying to coax a detector into spotting something that we’re not even sure what it might be.

But the reward for whoever makes the first definitive direct detection will be as big as it gets – a Nobel Prize for Physics is almost a nailed-on certainty.

Dark matter was first proposed in the 1930s to explain why galaxies in certain clusters move faster than should be possible if they only contained ordinary matter that we can see. Most physicists now think that this “missing mass” is some form of weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP), although its exact nature is still unknown.

Most dark-matter searches are located in deep underground laboratories because the overhead rock then shields the detectors from cosmic rays that can swamp the dark-matter signals.

But until you actually visit one of these experiments, it’s hard to appreciate the practical difficulties that are involved.

I recently travelled to the Boulby Underground Laboratory in Cleveland on the north-east coast of England for this video interview with lab manager Sean Paling from Sheffield University and the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.

Once you get underground, the Boulby lab – home to the ZEPLIN-III and DRIFT experiments – looks like any other. But as Sean explains in our video interview, getting the equipment down there is no mean feat.

Paling and colleagues might have a hard life, but they are lucky on one front – the lab is located in a working potash mine, which means that the UK forks out just £300,000 a year on infrastructure costs for housing its dark-matter search.

Other dark-matter searches, in contrast, are located in specially built labs. The XENON-100 and DAMA experiments, for example, are at the Gran Sasso lab deep inside the Apennines in central Italy, while the Cryogenic Dark Matter Search (CDMS) is in a disused mine. The US is even planning a giant new new Deep Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory (DUSEL) that will cost the US billions of dollars.

So the UK search, which has been leading the way for nearing 20 years, is great value for money. But like many areas of UK physics, the Boulby dark-matter work is currently facing turbulent financial times after a decade of healthy funding.

Sean acknowledges that times are hard, and that much effort is needed to secure funding for the future of the Boulby experiments. Let’s hope he and colleagues succeed as the search for dark matter is really starting to hot up as we reported last month.

You can find out more about the search for dark matter in this feature about the DAMA collaboration or in this feature about Boulby.

We’ve also got a second video looking more closely at the ZEPLIN-III and DRIFT experiments.

And if that’s not enough, Physics World columnist Robert Crease invites you to join him in a unique experiment in what will constitute a “discovery” in dark matter.

This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.
View all posts by this author  | View this author's profile

2 comments

  1. olaf ciachowski

    Only if dark matter, which neither emits nor reflects light, would consist of super-symmetric particles or WIMPs, we would have a chance of finding it in our 3 dimensional universe.
    Although, given the outsized amount of dark matter versus ordinary matter (factor 10:1), it should be a piece of cake to find it – but then we can’t.
    Thus, I submit, dark matter is beyond our reach stored in the extra spatial dimensions postulated by Kaluza and String Theory.
    Being stored there it can’t be seen by us, but its gravitational effects leak into our spacetime and are therefore part and parcel of calculations for certain celestial motions observed by astronomers.
    Who knows, dark matter might constitute the parallel universes physicists speculate about : http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/news/3151/something-big-found-beyond-edge-universe
    There we might even find “eternal realms”, that is worlds devoid of a time vector, which the mystics tell us about.
    It seems to me that physics has advanced beyond pure reductionism and is crossing the path with mystic thought systems and that makes it even more exciting.

  2. Pousta

    I would echo Olaf’s submission. I wrote to Brian Greene last year (2009) suggesting just the same thing, i.e. we can’t find dark matter particles because they don’t reside in ‘our’ 3 dimensions, but they reside in the other dimensions put forward in string theory. This in turn means it is impossible for us to see them because light does not interact except in ‘our’ 3 dimensions. The only way we will be able to see dark matter is through a gravity telescope/lense (i.e., similar to infra red devices, a telescope that sees gravity/gravitons).
    I would also suggest that black holes are a key component in interaction of particles between ‘our’ 3 dimensions and the other 7 dimensions. That is, black holes suck in huge amounts of matter, but also omit matter and energy in the form of protons/gamma rays/radiation. It must then be feasible that, if a singularity was where all dimensions come together (seeing as gravity seemingly impacts on all dimensions, not just ‘ours’, a singularity could cause all dimensions to collapse in on themselves), that the black hole could just as easily emit the equivalent of protons, gamma rays, radiation, ie. other types of strings, into the other dimensions. Could black holes be conversion machines, taking matter in and converting it into dark matter, spewing it out into other dimensions? If so it would also be feasible that a black hole is a two way door, i.e. allowing dark matter to convert into other matter/energy and be spouted back into ‘our’ 3 dimensions.

Leave a comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Guidelines

  • Comments should be relevant to the article and not be used to promote your own work, products or services.
  • Please keep your comments brief (we recommend a maximum of 250 words).
  • We reserve the right to remove excessively long, inappropriate or offensive entries.

Show/hide formatting guidelines

Tag Description Example Output
<a> Hyperlink <a href="http://www.google.com">google</a> google
<abbr> Abbreviation <abbr title="World Health Organisation" >WHO</abbr> WHO
<acronym> Acronym <acronym title="as soon as possible">ASAP</acronym> ASAP
<b> Bold <b>Some text</b> Some text
<blockquote> Quoted from another source <blockquote cite="http://iop.org/">IOP</blockquote>
IOP
<cite> Cite <cite>Diagram 1</cite> Diagram 1
<del> Deleted text From this line<del datetime="2012-12-17"> this text was deleted</del> From this line this text was deleted
<em> Emphasized text In this line<em> this text was emphasised</em> In this line this text was emphasised
<i> Italic <i>Some text</i> Some text
<q> Quotation WWF goal is to build a future <q cite="http://www.worldwildlife.org/who/index.html">
where people live in harmony with nature and animals</q>
WWF goal is to build a future
where people live in harmony with nature and animals
<strike> Strike text <strike>Some text</strike> Some text
<strong> Stronger emphasis of text <strong>Some text</strong> Some text
WordPress Appliance - Powered by TurnKey Linux