This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Skip to the content

Share this

Free weekly newswire

Sign up to receive all our latest news direct to your inbox.

Physics on film

100 Second Science Your scientific questions answered simply by specialists in less than 100 seconds.

Watch now

Bright Recruits

At all stages of your career – whether you're an undergraduate, graduate, researcher or industry professional – brightrecruits.com can help find the job for you.

Find your perfect job

Physics connect

Are you looking for a supplier? Physics Connect lists thousands of scientific companies, businesses, non-profit organizations, institutions and experts worldwide.

Start your search today

Blog

How to throw a shot

27117_2.JPG
Shot putters throw furthest at an angle of 37–38°

By Nicola Guttridge

Wimbledon? The World Cup? The Open Championship? Sport isn’t a great interest of mine, but despite my general ineptitude at most athletic activities, a recent paper caught my eye today in which two researchers studied the optimum angle of release in shotput – a problem that has baffled scientists since the 1970s. It’s not 45°, as you might expect. Instead, it turns out that athletes can throw a shot furthest when launched at a lower angle of about 37–38°. So why this difference in angle?

Alexander Lenz at the Technical University of Dortmund and Florian Rappl of the University of Regensburg in Germany puzzled over this and now believe that they have an explanation. It seems that the limitations aren’t in the mechanics but are to do with the human body. What it boils down to is that we humans are much better at pushing outwards than upwards, and so throwing the shot at a slightly lower angle than the expected 45° makes it travel further. To read more about this study, try the arXiv blog post.

As they point out, the human body’s preference for low angles of release is also apparent in weightlifting where weight records for bench pressing are much higher than for when the athlete tries to lift when standing.

Perhaps I should not have been surprised by the non-45° angle for shotputting. Back in 2006 scientists at the University of Brunel calculated the best angle to launch a football at during a throw-in and found it to be 30° to the horizontal – again, disagreeing with the expected angle of 45°. Most of these mistaken predicted angles can be explained by the theoretical calculations treating humans like perfect machines, a little reminiscent of superman – something that I’m sure many footballers would appreciate!

Another post I stumbled upon while reading around the shotput study was one about a completely different type of putting – golf. Robert Grober, an expert on the physics of golf at Yale University, has come up with a model to describe the perfect putt. Apparently the secret to golfing success lies in the behaviour of a simple pendulum being driven at twice its resonant frequency – I’m not sure how practical it’d be to attempt to use Grober’s model on a golf course, but even so it’s quite an interesting read. But then what do I know? I don’t like sport.

About the author
Nicola Guttridge is an intern with physicsworld.com

This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.
View all posts by this author  | View this author's profile

One comment to How to throw a shot

  1. Shotputting is not affected with air drag too much, because iron sphere, which is used for it is heavy and its speed is relatively low.

Leave a comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Guidelines

  • Comments should be relevant to the article and not be used to promote your own work, products or services.
  • Please keep your comments brief (we recommend a maximum of 250 words).
  • We reserve the right to remove excessively long, inappropriate or offensive entries.

Show/hide formatting guidelines

Tag Description Example Output
<a> Hyperlink <a href="http://www.google.com">google</a> google
<abbr> Abbreviation <abbr title="World Health Organisation" >WHO</abbr> WHO
<acronym> Acronym <acronym title="as soon as possible">ASAP</acronym> ASAP
<b> Bold <b>Some text</b> Some text
<blockquote> Quoted from another source <blockquote cite="http://iop.org/">IOP</blockquote>
IOP
<cite> Cite <cite>Diagram 1</cite> Diagram 1
<del> Deleted text From this line<del datetime="2012-12-17"> this text was deleted</del> From this line this text was deleted
<em> Emphasized text In this line<em> this text was emphasised</em> In this line this text was emphasised
<i> Italic <i>Some text</i> Some text
<q> Quotation WWF goal is to build a future <q cite="http://www.worldwildlife.org/who/index.html">
where people live in harmony with nature and animals</q>
WWF goal is to build a future
where people live in harmony with nature and animals
<strike> Strike text <strike>Some text</strike> Some text
<strong> Stronger emphasis of text <strong>Some text</strong> Some text
WordPress Appliance - Powered by TurnKey Linux