This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Skip to the content

Share this

Free weekly newswire

Sign up to receive all our latest news direct to your inbox.

Physics on film

100 Second Science Your scientific questions answered simply by specialists in less than 100 seconds.

Watch now

Bright Recruits

At all stages of your career – whether you're an undergraduate, graduate, researcher or industry professional – brightrecruits.com can help find the job for you.

Find your perfect job

Physics connect

Are you looking for a supplier? Physics Connect lists thousands of scientific companies, businesses, non-profit organizations, institutions and experts worldwide.

Start your search today

Blog

Royal Society releases new guide to climate change

roysoc.jpg

By Hamish Johnston

The UK’s premier scientific organization, the Royal Society, has released a “new short guide to the science of climate change”.

Entitled Climate Change: a Summary of the Science, the 19-page document can be downloaded here.

The guide was produced in part because of pressure from 43 members of the society, who had complained that a 2007 report from the organization did not acknowledge fully areas of uncertainty in climate science.

As a result, the report has a more measured tone, but still asserts “There is strong evidence that the warming of the Earth over the last half-century has been caused largely by human activity.”

This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.
View all posts by this author  | View this author's profile

One comment to Royal Society releases new guide to climate change

  1. David Tyler

    The document says: “A number of mechanisms have been proposed that could reduce or amplify the effect of solar variations; these remain areas of active research.” This is important. There have been periods during the past 2000 years when the Earth has been significantly warmer (Medieval Warm Period) and also much cooler (Little Ice Age) than at present. Since human activity resulting in CO2 emissions was negligible then, it would seem reasonable to give some priority to research into the causes of these cases of past climate change.
    I am sure all will agree with the policy conclusion: “However, the potential impacts of climate change are sufficiently serious that important decisions will need to be made.” I am glad to see that the authors have avoided giving the impression that cutting back on CO2 emissions will solve the problem.

Guidelines

  • Comments should be relevant to the article and not be used to promote your own work, products or services.
  • Please keep your comments brief (we recommend a maximum of 250 words).
  • We reserve the right to remove excessively long, inappropriate or offensive entries.

Show/hide formatting guidelines

Tag Description Example Output
<a> Hyperlink <a href="http://www.google.com">google</a> google
<abbr> Abbreviation <abbr title="World Health Organisation" >WHO</abbr> WHO
<acronym> Acronym <acronym title="as soon as possible">ASAP</acronym> ASAP
<b> Bold <b>Some text</b> Some text
<blockquote> Quoted from another source <blockquote cite="http://iop.org/">IOP</blockquote>
IOP
<cite> Cite <cite>Diagram 1</cite> Diagram 1
<del> Deleted text From this line<del datetime="2012-12-17"> this text was deleted</del> From this line this text was deleted
<em> Emphasized text In this line<em> this text was emphasised</em> In this line this text was emphasised
<i> Italic <i>Some text</i> Some text
<q> Quotation WWF goal is to build a future <q cite="http://www.worldwildlife.org/who/index.html">
where people live in harmony with nature and animals</q>
WWF goal is to build a future
where people live in harmony with nature and animals
<strike> Strike text <strike>Some text</strike> Some text
<strong> Stronger emphasis of text <strong>Some text</strong> Some text