This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Skip to the content

Share this

Free weekly newswire

Sign up to receive all our latest news direct to your inbox.

Physics on film

100 Second Science Your scientific questions answered simply by specialists in less than 100 seconds.

Watch now

Bright Recruits

At all stages of your career – whether you're an undergraduate, graduate, researcher or industry professional – can help find the job for you.

Find your perfect job

Physics connect

Are you looking for a supplier? Physics Connect lists thousands of scientific companies, businesses, non-profit organizations, institutions and experts worldwide.

Start your search today


Relativity’s flaws revealed on Twitter

Stephen Fry, wit, actor, Twitter giant (Courtesy: Wikimedia Commons)

By James Dacey

I visualize the social-networking site Twitter as a giant cocktail party where multiple conversations, all taking place at once, result in a cacophony of chitchat. Strolling around this gathering you come across crowded pockets where fans huddle round their favourite celebrities, looking for some juicy gossip or dazzling insight into their everyday lives. At the heart of all this you might spot a particularly attentive crowd gathered around the English actor and comedian, Stephen Fry, as he dishes out his devilishly sharp one-liners, always within the limit of 140 characters.

In reality, most of what Fry writes on Twitter is, as the man would say himself, Quite Interesting. But he does sometimes come out with some obscure gems, like yesterday when he drew the attention of his 2 million+ fans to this hilarious entry on Conservapedia about the supposed flaws in Einstein’s theory of relativity. For those not familiar with Conservapedia, it is promoted as “the trustworthy encyclopedia”, and directly contrasts itself with Wikipedia, which it criticizes on a number of points.

The Conservapedia entry comprises a list of 33 “counter-examples to relativity”, and I thought I would just pull out a couple.

Number 9: “The action-at-a-distance by Jesus, described in John 4:46-54”.

Number 21: “The lack of useful devices developed based on any insights provided by the theory; no lives have been saved or helped, and the theory has not led to other useful theories and may have interfered with scientific progress. This stands in stark contrast with every verified theory of science.”

I hope this blog entry doesn’t sound too sneering of people who might hold religious beliefs. And it is certainly not a bad thing to hope that science can lead to useful technologies that can help improve everyday lives. But these “counter-examples” on this ridiculous website give a completely false representation of the process of science. Besides, to say that relativity has no practical use is just plain wrong , as the accuracy of GPS systems depends on relativistic corrections, and these systems help to save plenty of lives. But there is no point in arguing with some people.

My sense of unease intensified when I read that Conservapedia boasts over 200 million views and more than 810,000 edits. Among the website’s guidelines it states that “we are neutral to the facts” and “everything you post must be true and verifiable”.

Just to give you a flavour of the site, here is Conservapedia‘s entry for “a liberal”: “someone who rejects logical and biblical standards, often for self-centered reasons. There are no coherent liberal standards; often a liberal is merely someone who craves attention, and who uses many words to say nothing”. Yep, that sounds both neutral and verifiable.

As for why Fry felt the need to tweet about this entry now…well it’s probably no coincidence that his picture appears on the Conservapedia homepage alongside an article on “atheism and obesity”. And why I wrote this blog entry giving Conservapedia more oxygen? Well, I’m not quite sure. Guess I was just quite angry.

This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.
View all posts by this author  | View this author's profile

One comment to Relativity’s flaws revealed on Twitter

  1. When someone says ‘wait for it…’ as a comedic device, it’s even funnier to just kick them in the crotch real fast.


  • Comments should be relevant to the article and not be used to promote your own work, products or services.
  • Please keep your comments brief (we recommend a maximum of 250 words).
  • We reserve the right to remove excessively long, inappropriate or offensive entries.

Show/hide formatting guidelines

Tag Description Example Output
<a> Hyperlink <a href="">google</a> google
<abbr> Abbreviation <abbr title="World Health Organisation" >WHO</abbr> WHO
<acronym> Acronym <acronym title="as soon as possible">ASAP</acronym> ASAP
<b> Bold <b>Some text</b> Some text
<blockquote> Quoted from another source <blockquote cite="">IOP</blockquote>
<cite> Cite <cite>Diagram 1</cite> Diagram 1
<del> Deleted text From this line<del datetime="2012-12-17"> this text was deleted</del> From this line this text was deleted
<em> Emphasized text In this line<em> this text was emphasised</em> In this line this text was emphasised
<i> Italic <i>Some text</i> Some text
<q> Quotation WWF goal is to build a future <q cite="">
where people live in harmony with nature and animals</q>
WWF goal is to build a future
where people live in harmony with nature and animals
<strike> Strike text <strike>Some text</strike> Some text
<strong> Stronger emphasis of text <strong>Some text</strong> Some text