This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Skip to the content

Share this

Free weekly newswire

Sign up to receive all our latest news direct to your inbox.

Physics on film

100 Second Science Your scientific questions answered simply by specialists in less than 100 seconds.

Watch now

Bright Recruits

At all stages of your career – whether you're an undergraduate, graduate, researcher or industry professional – brightrecruits.com can help find the job for you.

Find your perfect job

Physics connect

Are you looking for a supplier? Physics Connect lists thousands of scientific companies, businesses, non-profit organizations, institutions and experts worldwide.

Start your search today

Blog

If Einstein met Confucius

einsteinsml.jpg

By James Dacey

An exhibition about the life and work of Einstein will no longer appear in Shanghai following a fracas between Chinese and Swiss museums. The exhibition has been touring China as part of a celebration of 60 years of diplomatic relations between Switzerland and China.

According to the Associated Press, the show’s organizers from the Historical Museum of Bern were unhappy with plans of Shanghai’s Science and Technology Museum. The would-be hosts had apparently wanted to merge the Einstein show with a separate exhibit of comparable size about the great Chinese philosopher Confucius who lived more than 2000 years earlier.

With the Historical Museum of Bern yet to issue a public statement, the precise details of the disagreement remain somewhat hazy. But the developments have left me pondering what the great physicist himself would think about having an exhibition of his life’s achievements lined up alongside those of Confucius.

Indeed, Einstein was clearly far more than a great physicist. He was also a man deeply engaged in the social issues of his time, which was no doubt influenced by his own position – being a Jewish scientist living in Europe during the rise of Nazi Germany.

Although Einstein’s guiding principle seems to have been the wonder of science, it is hard not to think that he would have admired some of the ideas of Confucius. For instance, I’m sure that Einstein would have shared some of Confucius’ ethical concerns, especially his idea that individuals should strive towards moral perfection.

confucius.jpg

Einstein said as much in 1950 during a conversation with Reverend C. Greenaway, a minister in New York. “The most important human endeavour is the striving for morality in our actions. Our inner balance and even our very existence depend on it. Only morality in our actions can give beauty and dignity to life.”

Where the two men may have disagreed, however, is their view of humanity and collective human behaviour. Confucianism holds that through communal endeavour, humans are mouldable and perfectible. Einstein, on the other hand, appears to have taken a more hardened outlook, perhaps influenced by some of the events of his time.

“I don’t believe that humanity as such can change in essence, but I do believe it is possible and even necessary to put an end to anarchy in international relations,” he said in 1919 to Hedwig Born, the wife of Max Born, when talking about how individual states may have to give up their autonomy.

So I’m not saying that Einstein’s reflections on social philosophy and morality should overshadow his scientific achievements. But I just don’t think the idea that a Chinese museum would merge a showcase about his life with an exhibit about Confucius is such a weird idea. This is especially so given the influence Confucianism has had on political life in China.

This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.
View all posts by this author  | View this author's profile

5 comments

  1. Juha Savolainen

    Well, Einstein might have been delighted if his achievements were celebrated in China alongside the bold and critical works of Han Dynasty thinker Wang Chong (王充)! But Confucius? I doubt that.

  2. Thomas Murphy

    I agree with your instinct that Einstein and Confucius are compatible. However, I’d have preferred that the companion exhibit feature Lao Tzu, author of the ~2400 year old Tao Te Ching, who’s revered as the founder of Taoism — a world view shared by Confucius and 400 million or more contemporary adherents.
    The Tao Te Ching derives its assertions from inner observation. Relativity derives its assertions from technologically enhanced outer observation.
    Morality was most notably appended to Taoism by Confucius. Thus through the ages he’s been a darling of authorities invested in maintaining the status quo, which, understandably, is most often to their advantage. Lao Tzu, on the other hand, often symbolizes freedom and liberty, though never license.
    Tom

  3. John Duffield

    Einstein would have certainly agreed that [i]that through communal endeavour, humans are mouldable[/i].

  4. Robert L. Oldershaw

    Quantum Mechanics 2.0
    If you think you have a reasonably adequate understanding of what Quantum Mechanics teaches us about the discreteness of the physical world , and what it does not say about this topic, then I highly recommend a careful reading of the following paper, which won 3rd prize in a recent contest.
    http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1106/1106.1254v1.pdf
    Given:
    1. What is candidly revealed about QM in the above-linked paper,
    2. Surprising new two-slit experiment results,
    3. Recent bending of the uncertainty relations, and
    4. Recently published observations of wavefunctions,
    one might infer that the Platonic versions of Quantum Mechanics are under concerted attack by those who prefer scientific realism and empirical testing.
    Too bad Einstein and Schrodinger are not around to see these exciting developments, but of course they knew this had to come some day.
    Robert L. Oldershaw
    http://www3.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw

  5. Steve Douglas

    I really don’t see why it matters whether the views of Einstein and Confucious are compatible or not.
    People can go to an exhibition and look at two things can’t they?
    Even if the exhibition make comparisons between the two I’m sure people can make their own mind up about what they’re looking at.
    If Einstein said “it is possible and even necessary to put an end to anarchy in international relations” and the Swiss love Einstein and believe in his morals then maybe they should try it.

Leave a comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Guidelines

  • Comments should be relevant to the article and not be used to promote your own work, products or services.
  • Please keep your comments brief (we recommend a maximum of 250 words).
  • We reserve the right to remove excessively long, inappropriate or offensive entries.

Show/hide formatting guidelines

Tag Description Example Output
<a> Hyperlink <a href="http://www.google.com">google</a> google
<abbr> Abbreviation <abbr title="World Health Organisation" >WHO</abbr> WHO
<acronym> Acronym <acronym title="as soon as possible">ASAP</acronym> ASAP
<b> Bold <b>Some text</b> Some text
<blockquote> Quoted from another source <blockquote cite="http://iop.org/">IOP</blockquote>
IOP
<cite> Cite <cite>Diagram 1</cite> Diagram 1
<del> Deleted text From this line<del datetime="2012-12-17"> this text was deleted</del> From this line this text was deleted
<em> Emphasized text In this line<em> this text was emphasised</em> In this line this text was emphasised
<i> Italic <i>Some text</i> Some text
<q> Quotation WWF goal is to build a future <q cite="http://www.worldwildlife.org/who/index.html">
where people live in harmony with nature and animals</q>
WWF goal is to build a future
where people live in harmony with nature and animals
<strike> Strike text <strike>Some text</strike> Some text
<strong> Stronger emphasis of text <strong>Some text</strong> Some text
WordPress Appliance - Powered by TurnKey Linux