This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Skip to the content

Share this

Free weekly newswire

Sign up to receive all our latest news direct to your inbox.

Physics on film

100 Second Science Your scientific questions answered simply by specialists in less than 100 seconds.

Watch now

Bright Recruits

At all stages of your career – whether you're an undergraduate, graduate, researcher or industry professional – can help find the job for you.

Find your perfect job

Physics connect

Are you looking for a supplier? Physics Connect lists thousands of scientific companies, businesses, non-profit organizations, institutions and experts worldwide.

Start your search today


Third experiment homes in on neutrino mixing angle

By Hamish Johnston

Taking seventh place in our top 10 breakthroughs for 2011 were physicists working on the Tokai-to-Kamioka (T2K) experiment in Japan, who were the first to measure the rate at which muon neutrinos change into electron neutrinos (and then back into muon neutrinos) as they travel hundreds of kilometres through the Earth. This neutrino oscillation was then observed by scientists on the similar MINOS experiment in the US, with some degree of agreement between the two values. Both experiments provided important new information about the physics of neutrinos, which is by no means settled.

Neutrinos come in three “flavour” states – electron, muon and tau. However, physicists also believe that neutrinos can be described in terms of combinations of three mass states – m1, m2 and m3. Interference between these mass states gives rise to the observed oscillations of neutrino flavour.

Although physicists have measured many of the parameters that describe this flavour/mass system, one crucial value remains unclear. This is the “mixing angle” θ13, which is a measure of how the m1 and m3 mass states are combined within the flavour states.

T2K and MINOS have both given preliminary values for θ13 that are in rough agreement, and now a third experiment – Double Chooz in France – has also determined θ13 (what is actually measured is sin213).

Double Chooz took a different approach by looking at electron antineutrinos that are produced in two nuclear reactors and detected about 1 km away after travelling through solid rock. The electron antineutrinos are expected to oscillate to either muon or tau antineutrinos, and the rate at which electron antineutrinos vanish from the beam due to oscillation is determined by θ13 and one other parameter that is well known.

The experiment was run for 101 days and the number of electron antineutrinos that should have been detected was calculated to be 4344. Instead, the physicists only saw about 4100 events in the detector.

Double Chooz found that sin213 is about 0.086, whereas T2K suggests a value of about 0.11 and MINOS gives 0.04. All of these figures have large uncertainties associated with them and cannot be seen as definitive measurements of the mixing angle. What’s becoming clear, however, is that θ13 is not zero.

Once θ13 has been determined, the next challenge for physicists will be to work out if there are differences between the oscillations experienced by neutrinos and antineutrinos. The discovery of such an asymmetry could shed light on why there is much more matter than antimatter in the universe.

You can read a preprint describing the Double Chooz results here.

This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.
View all posts by this author  | View this author's profile

Comments are closed.


  • Comments should be relevant to the article and not be used to promote your own work, products or services.
  • Please keep your comments brief (we recommend a maximum of 250 words).
  • We reserve the right to remove excessively long, inappropriate or offensive entries.

Show/hide formatting guidelines

Tag Description Example Output
<a> Hyperlink <a href="">google</a> google
<abbr> Abbreviation <abbr title="World Health Organisation" >WHO</abbr> WHO
<acronym> Acronym <acronym title="as soon as possible">ASAP</acronym> ASAP
<b> Bold <b>Some text</b> Some text
<blockquote> Quoted from another source <blockquote cite="">IOP</blockquote>
<cite> Cite <cite>Diagram 1</cite> Diagram 1
<del> Deleted text From this line<del datetime="2012-12-17"> this text was deleted</del> From this line this text was deleted
<em> Emphasized text In this line<em> this text was emphasised</em> In this line this text was emphasised
<i> Italic <i>Some text</i> Some text
<q> Quotation WWF goal is to build a future <q cite="">
where people live in harmony with nature and animals</q>
WWF goal is to build a future
where people live in harmony with nature and animals
<strike> Strike text <strike>Some text</strike> Some text
<strong> Stronger emphasis of text <strong>Some text</strong> Some text