This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Skip to the content

Share this

Free weekly newswire

Sign up to receive all our latest news direct to your inbox.

Physics on film

100 Second Science Your scientific questions answered simply by specialists in less than 100 seconds.

Watch now

Bright Recruits

At all stages of your career – whether you're an undergraduate, graduate, researcher or industry professional – brightrecruits.com can help find the job for you.

Find your perfect job

Physics connect

Are you looking for a supplier? Physics Connect lists thousands of scientific companies, businesses, non-profit organizations, institutions and experts worldwide.

Start your search today

Blog

Has CDMS glimpsed dark matter?

Dark matter search results. The best fit to the CDMS result is the located at the black asterisk. The Xenon exclusion region is to the left of the green dashed lines. (Courtesy: CDMS)

Dark matter search results. The best fit to the CDMS result is the located at the black asterisk. The Xenon exclusion region is to the right of the green dashed lines. (Courtesy: CDMS)

By Hamish Johnston

Physicists working on the Cryogenic Dark Matter Search (CDMS) may have spotted three dark-matter particles in data from a detector deep beneath the North Woods of Minnesota. The measurement has a statistical significance of about 3σ – which is a long way from the gold standard of 5σ that usually heralds the discovery of a new particle. That said, this result is the best evidence yet that dark matter could be detected directly as it passes through the Earth.

Although there is much more dark matter than conventional matter in the universe, physicists are at a loss to describe exactly what the mysterious stuff is.

Despite the CDMS results, the mystery looks set to continue because the measurements are in significant disagreement with another dark-matter experiment called Xenon, which is using a large quantity of liquid xenon to try to detect dark matter. While Xenon hasn’t claimed to have seen any dark-matter particles, it has managed to exclude large swathes of possible combinations of dark-matter mass and interaction strength with normal matter.

The CDMS dark-matter particles are best described as having a mass of about 8.6 GeV/c2. When plotted against the measured interaction strength (see diagram), the CDMS result (the black asterisk) falls well inside the region already excluded by Xenon to the right of the light- and dark-green dashed lines.

The story is even more curious because the measurements were made several years ago using a silicon detector – rather than the main germanium detector developed by CDMS. The team decided to revisit the silicon data because of a growing interest in the possibility that dark-matter particles could have mass of less than about 15 GeV/c2. Dark matter is detected when it collides with nuclei in the detectors and because silicon is less massive than germanium, it should be better at detecting lighter dark-matter particles.

A dark-matter particle weighing in at just 8.6 GeV/c2 is not something that many expected and it is seemingly at odds with several astronomical and particle-physics theories and observations. Indeed, very preliminary evidence from more indirect dark-matter searches such as AMS suggests a mass of several hundred GeV/c2.

Of course we know very little about dark matter, so who’s to say that there aren’t two or more dark-matter particles with very different masses. That’s the theme of a blog entry by Lubos Motl, which you can read here.

There is also a good discussion of the results on the Resonaances blog.

You can read a preprint describing the results here.

This entry was posted in General and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.
View all posts by this author  | View this author's profile

6 comments

  1. John Duffield

    Hank Campbell wrote a good article on this, see http://www.science20.com/science_20/wimp_3_sigma_signal_road_dark_matter-109299

    I had to smile when I read Lubos Motl saying this: “It seems unlikely that it’s composed of any particles we already know; so we seem to need a new particle species. One new particle species seems enough and for many of us, it’s preferred to have exactly one new particle because such an assumption is economic, elegant, and so on.” Compare that with what Einstein said*: “the energy of a gravitational field shall act gravitatively in the same way as any other kind of energy”. Motl would have us “assuming” that the economical elegant reason is that there’s WIMPs in there. And then doubtless some collaboration will sift their events and their sigmas and their damn statistics, and announce they’d found ‘em.

    • M.Asghar

      If the dark matter does exist and in such a huge amount, all types of intellectual and physical effort has to be made to pin it down beyond this rather nice sounding but empty cynicism.

  2. Trackback: LUX dark-matter search comes up empty - Technology Org

  3. Trackback: Dark Matter - Page 2 - Christian Forums

  4. Trackback: A simple test for the EU people. (2) - Page 3 - Christian Forums

  5. Trackback: LUX dark-matter search comes up empty | Micro Physics

Leave a comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Guidelines

  • Comments should be relevant to the article and not be used to promote your own work, products or services.
  • Please keep your comments brief (we recommend a maximum of 250 words).
  • We reserve the right to remove excessively long, inappropriate or offensive entries.

Show/hide formatting guidelines

Tag Description Example Output
<a> Hyperlink <a href="http://www.google.com">google</a> google
<abbr> Abbreviation <abbr title="World Health Organisation" >WHO</abbr> WHO
<acronym> Acronym <acronym title="as soon as possible">ASAP</acronym> ASAP
<b> Bold <b>Some text</b> Some text
<blockquote> Quoted from another source <blockquote cite="http://iop.org/">IOP</blockquote>
IOP
<cite> Cite <cite>Diagram 1</cite> Diagram 1
<del> Deleted text From this line<del datetime="2012-12-17"> this text was deleted</del> From this line this text was deleted
<em> Emphasized text In this line<em> this text was emphasised</em> In this line this text was emphasised
<i> Italic <i>Some text</i> Some text
<q> Quotation WWF goal is to build a future <q cite="http://www.worldwildlife.org/who/index.html">
where people live in harmony with nature and animals</q>
WWF goal is to build a future
where people live in harmony with nature and animals
<strike> Strike text <strike>Some text</strike> Some text
<strong> Stronger emphasis of text <strong>Some text</strong> Some text
WordPress Appliance - Powered by TurnKey Linux