This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Skip to the content

Share this

Free weekly newswire

Sign up to receive all our latest news direct to your inbox.

Physics on film

100 Second Science Your scientific questions answered simply by specialists in less than 100 seconds.

Watch now

Bright Recruits

At all stages of your career – whether you're an undergraduate, graduate, researcher or industry professional – can help find the job for you.

Find your perfect job

Physics connect

Are you looking for a supplier? Physics Connect lists thousands of scientific companies, businesses, non-profit organizations, institutions and experts worldwide.

Start your search today


Project Einstein, NASA shares its wealth, how the kettle got its whistle and more

This image of the Mona Lisa has been stabilized using technology developed by NASA to study solar flares (Courtesy: Marblar)

This image of the Mona Lisa has been stabilized using technology developed by NASA to study solar flares. (Courtesy: Marblar)

By Hamish Johnston

The best thing about science fiction is that it is fiction, and nit-picking about scientific accuracy shouldn’t get in the way of telling a good story. That’s the theme of Roger Highfield’s review of the latest blockbuster Gravity. Writing in his old paper The Daily Telegraph, Highfield – who now works at London’s Science Museum – takes exception to a series of Tweets by the celebrity astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson about the film. Among other things, the Tweets complain that Sandra Bullock’s hair should be wafting around in zero gravity, not hanging down as it would on Earth. Despite these and other “scientific holes big enough to fly a Saturn V rocket through” both Highfield and Tyson agree that Gravity is a film well worth seeing. The review is called “Gravity: how real is the science?“.

While it’s an urban myth that NASA invented Tang drink crystals, the space agency has given us a wide range of useful technologies including tools for search-and-rescue and implantable medical devices. Now the agency has joined forces with a start-up company called Marblar to turn more of NASA’s intellectual property into commercial products. The UK-based company wants you to “Turn patented science into new products and earn a cut of the royalties.” There are already 14 NASA-patented technologies available on Marblar and one involves the image-stabilization technique illustrated above. The total number of patents will rise to 40 over the next few weeks – so get your entrepreneur’s hat on.

Never one for shying away from the more controversial aspects of genetics, the physicist Stephen Hsu has written a post about why he is taking part in Project Einstein on his blog Information Processing. Set up by the geneticist and multimillionaire Jonathan Rothberg and the physicist Max Tegmark, the project will apparently study the DNA of about 400 mathematicians and theoretical physicists from top US universities – at least according to an article in Nature entitled  “Root of maths genius sought“.

As clocks go back and the gloom of winter sets it – at least here in England – there’s nothing like a nice cup of tea. And if you have ever wondered how the kettle got its whistle, two physicists at the University of Cambridge have worked it out. You can read all about it in Cambridge’s Research magazine and more details can be found in a paper entitled “The aeroacoustics of a steam kettle“.

This entry was posted in The Red Folder and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
View all posts by this author  | View this author's profile

One comment to Project Einstein, NASA shares its wealth, how the kettle got its whistle and more

  1. M. Asghar

    The Project Einstein should be worthwhile in the context of the Connectome Project to explore the brain’s structure. However, the origin of “genius” may be due to a collective quantum mechanical activity of neurons in the brain.


  • Comments should be relevant to the article and not be used to promote your own work, products or services.
  • Please keep your comments brief (we recommend a maximum of 250 words).
  • We reserve the right to remove excessively long, inappropriate or offensive entries.

Show/hide formatting guidelines

Tag Description Example Output
<a> Hyperlink <a href="">google</a> google
<abbr> Abbreviation <abbr title="World Health Organisation" >WHO</abbr> WHO
<acronym> Acronym <acronym title="as soon as possible">ASAP</acronym> ASAP
<b> Bold <b>Some text</b> Some text
<blockquote> Quoted from another source <blockquote cite="">IOP</blockquote>
<cite> Cite <cite>Diagram 1</cite> Diagram 1
<del> Deleted text From this line<del datetime="2012-12-17"> this text was deleted</del> From this line this text was deleted
<em> Emphasized text In this line<em> this text was emphasised</em> In this line this text was emphasised
<i> Italic <i>Some text</i> Some text
<q> Quotation WWF goal is to build a future <q cite="">
where people live in harmony with nature and animals</q>
WWF goal is to build a future
where people live in harmony with nature and animals
<strike> Strike text <strike>Some text</strike> Some text
<strong> Stronger emphasis of text <strong>Some text</strong> Some text