This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Skip to the content

Share this

Free weekly newswire

Sign up to receive all our latest news direct to your inbox.

Physics on film

100 Second Science Your scientific questions answered simply by specialists in less than 100 seconds.

Watch now

Bright Recruits

At all stages of your career – whether you're an undergraduate, graduate, researcher or industry professional – brightrecruits.com can help find the job for you.

Find your perfect job

Physics connect

Are you looking for a supplier? Physics Connect lists thousands of scientific companies, businesses, non-profit organizations, institutions and experts worldwide.

Start your search today

Blog

A network analysis of the FIFA World Cup

(Courtesy: Paolo Cintia and Luca Pappalardo)

(Courtesy: Paolo Cintia and Luca Pappalardo)

By James Dacey

The FIFA World Cup is under way in Brazil as the national teams from 32 nations battle it out on the pitch for the most prestigious prize in football. It is also an exciting month for football fans across the world as everyone suddenly becomes an expert on the game. Offices, bars and cafes around the world echo with the sound of post-match analysis.

This post-match dissection has now been taken to another level by a pair of computer scientists at the University of Pisa in Italy. At the request of Physics World, Paolo Cintia and Luca Pappalardo have carried out a network analysis of the opening match of the tournament, which saw the hosts Brazil defeat Croatia by three goals to one. Cintia and Pappalardo have viewed the match as if it were an evolving network where players represent nodes that interact by passing the ball to each other along “edges”.

In the resulting image, the size of players’ name is proportional to the degree in the network, determined by the number of incoming and outgoing passes. The thickness of the edges between two given nodes is proportional to the number of passes between those two players during the time they were both on the pitch. So what did the researchers discover? At this point I’ll make an apology to non-football fans, because some of the next bit might mean absolutely nothing to you (thanks for getting this far anyway!).

Not that surprisingly, the most central player in the Croatian network was their midfield playmaker Luka Modrić. Perhaps more surprisingly, the most central player in the Brazilian network was their rightback Dani Alves (Alves da Silva), who is renowned for covering an awful lot of ground during games as he sprints up and down the right flank.

Taking their analysis to a higher level, Cintia and Pappalardo say that the network entropy of Brazil (the incertitude of the next pass) is higher than that of Croatia. In plain English what they are saying is that Brazil’s style of play was more diverse than that of Croatia; Brazil shared the ball among the team whereas Croatia tended to pass among the same players.

In the end of course, the only thing that matters to die-hard football fans is that their team wins the match. In this example, the more diverse team won but I’m sure there are plenty of other cases where the more predictable style won out.  Likewise, being the most central player in a network does not necessarily translate to being the most influential – it’s what you do with the ball that counts. Still, there’s nothing wrong with bringing a bit of science to football analysis. It can’t be any less insightful than what the television pundits come out with!

Cintia and Pappalardo carried out the analysis at the Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining Laboratory (KDD LAB), a joint initiative of the University of Pisa and National Research Council of Italy (CNR).

This entry was posted in General and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
View all posts by this author  | View this author's profile

5 comments

  1. Trackback: Physics Viewpoint | A network analysis of the FIFA World Cup

  2. great job, but the brazilian players name are all wrong. I wouldn´t comment this but croatia´s players name are right.

  3. Omi Shetye

    Can this be used to predict results of other matches. (Just curious, not a betting man)

  4. M. Asghar

    In terms of passsing and repassing the balle amongst the players, so far the “game entropy” seemed to have the highest value for the Spanish team yet they have been been eliminated in the first round of the context!

Leave a comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Guidelines

  • Comments should be relevant to the article and not be used to promote your own work, products or services.
  • Please keep your comments brief (we recommend a maximum of 250 words).
  • We reserve the right to remove excessively long, inappropriate or offensive entries.

Show/hide formatting guidelines

Tag Description Example Output
<a> Hyperlink <a href="http://www.google.com">google</a> google
<abbr> Abbreviation <abbr title="World Health Organisation" >WHO</abbr> WHO
<acronym> Acronym <acronym title="as soon as possible">ASAP</acronym> ASAP
<b> Bold <b>Some text</b> Some text
<blockquote> Quoted from another source <blockquote cite="http://iop.org/">IOP</blockquote>
IOP
<cite> Cite <cite>Diagram 1</cite> Diagram 1
<del> Deleted text From this line<del datetime="2012-12-17"> this text was deleted</del> From this line this text was deleted
<em> Emphasized text In this line<em> this text was emphasised</em> In this line this text was emphasised
<i> Italic <i>Some text</i> Some text
<q> Quotation WWF goal is to build a future <q cite="http://www.worldwildlife.org/who/index.html">
where people live in harmony with nature and animals</q>
WWF goal is to build a future
where people live in harmony with nature and animals
<strike> Strike text <strike>Some text</strike> Some text
<strong> Stronger emphasis of text <strong>Some text</strong> Some text
WordPress Appliance - Powered by TurnKey Linux