This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Skip to the content

Share this

Free weekly newswire

Sign up to receive all our latest news direct to your inbox.

Physics on film

100 Second Science Your scientific questions answered simply by specialists in less than 100 seconds.

Watch now

Bright Recruits

At all stages of your career – whether you're an undergraduate, graduate, researcher or industry professional – can help find the job for you.

Find your perfect job

Physics connect

Are you looking for a supplier? Physics Connect lists thousands of scientific companies, businesses, non-profit organizations, institutions and experts worldwide.

Start your search today


Getting a fix on quantum computations

Nine superconducting qubit

Bit of choice: A photograph of the nine superconducting qubit device developed by the Martinis group at the University of California, Santa Barbara, where, for the first time, the qubits are able to detect and effectively protect each other from bit errors. (Courtesy: Julian Kelly/Martinis group)

By Tushna Commissariat in New York City, US

Although the APS March meeting finished last Friday and I am now in New York visiting a few more labs and physicists in the city (more on that later), I am still playing catch-up, thanks to the vast number of interesting talks at the conference. One of the most interesting sessions of last week, and a pretty popular one at that, was based on “20 years of quantum error correction” and I went along to the opening talk by physicist John Preskill of the California Institute of Technology. I had the chance to catch up with Preskill after his talk and we discussed just why he thinks that we are not too far away from a true quantum revolution.

Just in case you haven’t come across the subject already, quantum error correction is the science of protecting quantum information (or qubits) from errors that would occur as the information is influenced by the environment and other sorts of quantum noise, causing it to “decohere” and lose its quantum state. Although it may seem premature that scientists have been working on this problem for nearly two decades when an actual quantum computer has yet to be built, we know that we must account for such errors if our quantum computers are ever to succeed. It will be essential if we want to achieve fault-tolerant quantum computation that can deal with all sorts of noise within the system, as well as faults in the hardware (such as a faulty gate) or even a measurement.

Over the past 20 years, theoretical work in the field has made scientists confident that quantum computing of the future will be scalable. Preskill says that “it’s exciting because the experimentalists are taking it quite seriously now”, while initially the interest was mainly theoretical. Previously, scientists would artificially create the noise in the quantum systems that they would correct but now actual quantum computations can be fixed. Indeed, Preskill says that one of the key things that has really moved quantum error correction along in the past few years is the concentrated improvement of the hardware used, i.e. better gates with multiple qubits being processed simultaneously.

Today, we have a variety of qubits at our disposal, including the ever-popular superconducting qubit (which is stable and best suited in an actual quantum computer), photonic qubits (which would be good for communications), spin qubits and ion traps (they are fundamentally reproducible and easy to scale up to 50–100 qubits). Each of these has its own pros and cons, and different experimental groups and companies all over the world are working towards turning one of them into the key element of the first quantum computer. With both superconducting circuits and ion traps, scientists have managed to correct a two-qubit gate so that it has an error rate of less than 1% and some of these results were presented at the session.

Surprisingly, the quest to fix quantum errors has helped improve our understanding of other areas of physics – such as topological phases of matter and new insights into quantum gravity – that at first glance seem unrelated. The cosmological aspect is of particular interest to Preskill, who has been looking into simulating the dynamics of black-hole interiors, which can be done “using highly entangled quantum systems under the right circumstances”, he says. Indeed, in one of the last slide’s of his talk, Preskill quoted his former postdoc Beni Yoshida as saying “now is the time for quantum information scientists to jump into black holes”.

The idea has definitely caught the interest of a number of researchers in both fields and has now spawned the “It from Qubit” collaboration, funded by the Simons Foundation. The collaboration hopes to break the barriers between fundamental physics and quantum information theory by bringing together top players from both fields – such as Preskill, Scott Aaronson, Leonard Susskind and others – to “foster communication, education and collaboration between them, thereby advancing both fields and ultimately solving some of the deepest problems in physics”.

Indeed, it hopes to answer questions such as “Does space–time emerge from entanglement?” and “How does quantum information flow in time?”. The project is headed by Patrick Hayden of Stanford University, who has worked with Preskill in the past on black-hole firewalls and quantum computations. The collaboration has an upcoming interdisciplinary summer school at the Perimeter Institute in Canada this July and I for one am looking forward to seeing how these two fundamental fields of physics come together.

This entry was posted in APS March Meeting 2016 and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
View all posts by this author  | View this author's profile


  1. Jason Evans

    I guess this answers the question of whether quantum computing has any spin-offs!

  2. Debbie Leung

    “Preskill quoted his student Ben Yoshida” should be “Preskill quoted his former postdoc Beni Yoshida”


  • Comments should be relevant to the article and not be used to promote your own work, products or services.
  • Please keep your comments brief (we recommend a maximum of 250 words).
  • We reserve the right to remove excessively long, inappropriate or offensive entries.

Show/hide formatting guidelines

Tag Description Example Output
<a> Hyperlink <a href="">google</a> google
<abbr> Abbreviation <abbr title="World Health Organisation" >WHO</abbr> WHO
<acronym> Acronym <acronym title="as soon as possible">ASAP</acronym> ASAP
<b> Bold <b>Some text</b> Some text
<blockquote> Quoted from another source <blockquote cite="">IOP</blockquote>
<cite> Cite <cite>Diagram 1</cite> Diagram 1
<del> Deleted text From this line<del datetime="2012-12-17"> this text was deleted</del> From this line this text was deleted
<em> Emphasized text In this line<em> this text was emphasised</em> In this line this text was emphasised
<i> Italic <i>Some text</i> Some text
<q> Quotation WWF goal is to build a future <q cite="">
where people live in harmony with nature and animals</q>
WWF goal is to build a future
where people live in harmony with nature and animals
<strike> Strike text <strike>Some text</strike> Some text
<strong> Stronger emphasis of text <strong>Some text</strong> Some text