This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Skip to the content

Share this

Free weekly newswire

Sign up to receive all our latest news direct to your inbox.

Physics on film

100 Second Science Your scientific questions answered simply by specialists in less than 100 seconds.

Watch now

Bright Recruits

At all stages of your career – whether you're an undergraduate, graduate, researcher or industry professional – brightrecruits.com can help find the job for you.

Find your perfect job

Physics connect

Are you looking for a supplier? Physics Connect lists thousands of scientific companies, businesses, non-profit organizations, institutions and experts worldwide.

Start your search today

Blog

US policy chiefs explain how to handle Trump

At the AAAS meeting in Boston, February 2017, Neal Lane introduces John Holdren (left), Kerri-Ann Jones (centre) and Rosina Bierbaum

Speaking out – Neal Lane introduces John Holdren (left), Kerri-Ann Jones (centre) and Rosina Bierbaum at the 2017 meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Boston.

By Matin Durrani in Boston, US

I’m here at the 2017 meeting of the American Assocation for the Advancement of Science in Boston, where the theme is “Serving society through science policy”. The focus was picked last year, but it turned out to be an auspicious choice with the election of Donald Trump throwing the science community into uncharted policy waters.

Trying to make sense of what life will be like for US scientists under the Trump administration were five people with extensive experience of working closely with recent US presidents.

Chairing the session was Neal Lane, who served as Bill Clinton’s presidential science adviser for two years in the 1990s. Also present was physicist John Holdren, who spent eight years until last month as Barack Obama’s science chief, for which the audience gave him a generous round of applause.

The other speakers were Kerri-Ann Jones (a one-time head of the Office of Science and Technology Policy), former Congressman Bart Gordon, and Rosina Bierbaum, who served on Obama’s PCAST panel of top scientists.

And if you didn’t know that PCAST stands for the clunkily titled President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, you’re not alone. Bierbaum joked that Obama couldn’t remember either and used to simply call this 20-strong panel of experts “my scientists”.

As Bierbaum put it, “Obama made science cool”. The former president took it seriously too, bringing on top scientists like Holdren, Nobel laureate Steven Chu and Ernest Moniz into key positions in his administration, formulating principles underpinning scientific integrity in policy making, and ensuring science and technology is well funded and made accessible to all.

Now, though, we are living in very different times and the panel discussed how they see science faring under Trump. The good news, according to Holdren, is that many people in Congress understand the importance of science and technology, where there’s a long history of bipartisanship. We can therefore probably expect continued support for science, Holdren added, though there may be a shift away from energy research. The bad news, for Holdren, is that he can see Trump cutting support for basic science, climate monitoring and scientific infrastructure. “We could be in for a major shift in cluture,” Holdren added.

So what can scientists do to make the case for science? Holdren had five points of action, which I paraphrase here.

1. Don’t be discouraged or intimidated.

2. Carry on doing your science.

3. Inform yourself more fully about the impact of science on society.

4. Give 10% of your time to “public service” for science, such as speaking to non-scientists about why science is vital.

5. Focus your efforts and work with colleagues from other disciplines on activities that will have the most impact. “Don’t pounce on each day’s indignity,” he said.

The other panellists made similar points, including the need to tell “stories” showing how basic research benefits society, such as Einstein’s general relativity being crucial for GPS. (Though how you sell the benefits of science to a taxi driver who’s lost his job because of GPS-powered Uber taxis putting him out of business is a tricky challenge.)

The basic problem, though, as Gordon underlined, is that we simply don’t know how Trump will act. As he put it: “Trump is not captive to consistency.”

This entry was posted in AAAS meeting 2017 and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
View all posts by this author  | View this author's profile

2 comments

  1. M. Asghar

    The dynamics of scientific activity is too solid and powerful to be disturbed by Trump’s hair-blown idiosyncrasies. However, sharp vigilance is worthwhile.

  2. M. Asghar

    The tension created by the Trump science policies may not that harmful after all, because they should help to concentrate the minds of the scientists and of those running the the scientific institutions to rationalise their work and responsabilities.

Guidelines

  • Comments should be relevant to the article and not be used to promote your own work, products or services.
  • Please keep your comments brief (we recommend a maximum of 250 words).
  • We reserve the right to remove excessively long, inappropriate or offensive entries.

Show/hide formatting guidelines

Tag Description Example Output
<a> Hyperlink <a href="http://www.google.com">google</a> google
<abbr> Abbreviation <abbr title="World Health Organisation" >WHO</abbr> WHO
<acronym> Acronym <acronym title="as soon as possible">ASAP</acronym> ASAP
<b> Bold <b>Some text</b> Some text
<blockquote> Quoted from another source <blockquote cite="http://iop.org/">IOP</blockquote>
IOP
<cite> Cite <cite>Diagram 1</cite> Diagram 1
<del> Deleted text From this line<del datetime="2012-12-17"> this text was deleted</del> From this line this text was deleted
<em> Emphasized text In this line<em> this text was emphasised</em> In this line this text was emphasised
<i> Italic <i>Some text</i> Some text
<q> Quotation WWF goal is to build a future <q cite="http://www.worldwildlife.org/who/index.html">
where people live in harmony with nature and animals</q>
WWF goal is to build a future
where people live in harmony with nature and animals
<strike> Strike text <strike>Some text</strike> Some text
<strong> Stronger emphasis of text <strong>Some text</strong> Some text