This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Skip to the content

Share this

Free weekly newswire

Sign up to receive all our latest news direct to your inbox.

Physics on film

100 Second Science Your scientific questions answered simply by specialists in less than 100 seconds.

Watch now

Bright Recruits

At all stages of your career – whether you're an undergraduate, graduate, researcher or industry professional – can help find the job for you.

Find your perfect job

Physics connect

Are you looking for a supplier? Physics Connect lists thousands of scientific companies, businesses, non-profit organizations, institutions and experts worldwide.

Start your search today


A monument to peer review

The world's first momument to peer review

The world’s first monument to peer review could be completed by mid-October. (Courtesy: Igor Chirikov)

By Michael Banks

The Russian sociologist Igor Chirikov from the National Research University Higher School of Economics in Moscow has much to celebrate during this year’s Peer Review Week.

He is now putting in place plans to build what will be the world’s first monument to anonymous peer review and is expecting it to be complete in mid-October.

Earlier this month, Chirikov began a Kickstarter campaign aiming to raise $1300 by 2 October for a sculptor to turn an “ugly” block of concrete outside the university’s Institute of Education into a die. Not any ordinary numbered die, however, but one that would read “accept”, “minor changes”, “major changes”, “revise and resubmit” and “reject” on its five visible sides.

Chirikov, who is also based at the Center for Studies in Higher Education at the University of California, Berkeley, US, told that the idea came about as he wanted to acknowledge the role of peer reviewers and use it to “have a good laugh about [the] peer reviewer process together with academics”. He adds, “They are absolutely necessary to advance our knowledge though their contribution is not always recognized. At the same time, I feel for researchers. It’s hard to deal with rejection letters and sometimes nasty comments from reviewers.”

Anyone who pledges $1 will get their names on a nearby sign, while those who give $25 or more will get a small model of the monument. Those who stump up $40 or more will receive two models of the monument while $60 or more will get the title of your paper on the monument itself (although there is only space for 20 titles).

Chirikov already exceeded his target just weeks after starting his fundraising campaign  and has so far raised $2235 via 109 backers. He says that all the cash raised will be spent and that any extra money will enable them to build it faster and to use more durable – and more expensive – materials.

“I hoped that many academics will like the idea but was a bit surprised how fast we’ve reached the fundraising goal,” Chirikov told “It means that there are common challenges in [the] academic profession across the world and disciplines. It also means that scholars have a good sense of humour.”

This week IOP Publishing is playing its part in Peer Review Week 2016 and has announced a raft of new initiatives, including a dedicated website about peer review, a new partnership with Publons – a reviewer recognition service – as well as a trial of double-blind peer review.

This entry was posted in Peer Review Week 2016 and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.
View all posts by this author  | View this author's profile

Comments are closed.


  • Comments should be relevant to the article and not be used to promote your own work, products or services.
  • Please keep your comments brief (we recommend a maximum of 250 words).
  • We reserve the right to remove excessively long, inappropriate or offensive entries.

Show/hide formatting guidelines

Tag Description Example Output
<a> Hyperlink <a href="">google</a> google
<abbr> Abbreviation <abbr title="World Health Organisation" >WHO</abbr> WHO
<acronym> Acronym <acronym title="as soon as possible">ASAP</acronym> ASAP
<b> Bold <b>Some text</b> Some text
<blockquote> Quoted from another source <blockquote cite="">IOP</blockquote>
<cite> Cite <cite>Diagram 1</cite> Diagram 1
<del> Deleted text From this line<del datetime="2012-12-17"> this text was deleted</del> From this line this text was deleted
<em> Emphasized text In this line<em> this text was emphasised</em> In this line this text was emphasised
<i> Italic <i>Some text</i> Some text
<q> Quotation WWF goal is to build a future <q cite="">
where people live in harmony with nature and animals</q>
WWF goal is to build a future
where people live in harmony with nature and animals
<strike> Strike text <strike>Some text</strike> Some text
<strong> Stronger emphasis of text <strong>Some text</strong> Some text