This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Skip to the content

Share this

Free weekly newswire

Sign up to receive all our latest news direct to your inbox.

Physics on film

100 Second Science Your scientific questions answered simply by specialists in less than 100 seconds.

Watch now

Bright Recruits

At all stages of your career – whether you're an undergraduate, graduate, researcher or industry professional – can help find the job for you.

Find your perfect job

Physics connect

Are you looking for a supplier? Physics Connect lists thousands of scientific companies, businesses, non-profit organizations, institutions and experts worldwide.

Start your search today


Entangled and stringy videos, a new chat show about the heavens, Hawking and Newton hit the Oregon Trail and more

By Hamish Johnston

This week’s Red Folder begins with a pair of videos that attempt to explain some of the most difficult concepts in physics. First up is a video featuring physicist and filmmaker Derek Muller, who does a lovely job of explaining quantum entanglement with the help of a few cardboard cut-outs and a couple of spinning avatars (see above).

Also premiering this week is a video by Fermilab’s Don Lincoln, in which he takes on the knotty subject of string theory using props including a vibrating plate and a hula-hoop. Does Lincoln believe in string theory? You’ll have to watch the video below to find out.

Coming to a screen near you is a new chat show hosted by the astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson, who also presented last year’s revival of the TV series Cosmos. According to the Hollywood news website The Wrap, the late-night talk show will be called Star Talk – which shares the same name as Tyson’s radio chat show.

Tyson is a showbiz veteran, but appearing on television can be stressful for the average astrophysicist, especially if the producers get the name of your institute wrong. That is what happened to Tim O’Brien when he appeared on the BBC this morning. Do you think the production people were wondering why an observer of banks was commenting on the heavens?

Ending on the video theme, late last week throngs of ageing gamers (and I’m guessing a fair few physicists) were rejoicing when more than 2000 MS-DOS games from the 1980s and 1990s became available on the Internet Archive. The folks at RedOrbit clearly have too much time on their hands because they have now answered this pressing question about their favourite video game The Oregon Trail, which debuted in 1990: “Would Stephen Hawking, Albert Einstein, Sir Isaac Newton, and Bill Nye survive the Oregon Trail?”.

Try not to spend too much of your weekend playing Super Munchers!


This entry was posted in The Red Folder and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.
View all posts by this author  | View this author's profile

One comment to Entangled and stringy videos, a new chat show about the heavens, Hawking and Newton hit the Oregon Trail and more

  1. Trackback: Physics Viewpoint | Entangled and stringy videos, a new chat show about the heavens, Hawking and Newton hit the Oregon Trail and more


  • Comments should be relevant to the article and not be used to promote your own work, products or services.
  • Please keep your comments brief (we recommend a maximum of 250 words).
  • We reserve the right to remove excessively long, inappropriate or offensive entries.

Show/hide formatting guidelines

Tag Description Example Output
<a> Hyperlink <a href="">google</a> google
<abbr> Abbreviation <abbr title="World Health Organisation" >WHO</abbr> WHO
<acronym> Acronym <acronym title="as soon as possible">ASAP</acronym> ASAP
<b> Bold <b>Some text</b> Some text
<blockquote> Quoted from another source <blockquote cite="">IOP</blockquote>
<cite> Cite <cite>Diagram 1</cite> Diagram 1
<del> Deleted text From this line<del datetime="2012-12-17"> this text was deleted</del> From this line this text was deleted
<em> Emphasized text In this line<em> this text was emphasised</em> In this line this text was emphasised
<i> Italic <i>Some text</i> Some text
<q> Quotation WWF goal is to build a future <q cite="">
where people live in harmony with nature and animals</q>
WWF goal is to build a future
where people live in harmony with nature and animals
<strike> Strike text <strike>Some text</strike> Some text
<strong> Stronger emphasis of text <strong>Some text</strong> Some text