This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Skip to the content

Share this

Free weekly newswire

Sign up to receive all our latest news direct to your inbox.

Physics on film

100 Second Science Your scientific questions answered simply by specialists in less than 100 seconds.

Watch now

Bright Recruits

At all stages of your career – whether you're an undergraduate, graduate, researcher or industry professional – brightrecruits.com can help find the job for you.

Find your perfect job

Physics connect

Are you looking for a supplier? Physics Connect lists thousands of scientific companies, businesses, non-profit organizations, institutions and experts worldwide.

Start your search today

Blog

A tenner in space, why just 0.3% of LIGO bagged the Nobel, sounding-off in Havana

Tenner, nine, eight...: Mary Sommerville has lifted off (Courtesy: RBS)

Tenner, nine, eight…: Mary Sommerville has lifted off (Courtesy: RBS)

By Hamish Johnston and Matin Durrani

Primary school children in Scotland have celebrated the launch of a new £10 note by launching it into space. Well, sort of. The Royal Bank of Scotland note was actually sent aloft on a high-altitude balloon with a camera to capture the event for posterity.

If you know your astronomers, you will recognize Mary Sommerville on the tenner. She was active in the early 19th century and famously predicted the existence of Neptune by its influence on the orbit of Uranus. She and Caroline Herschel were the first women to be members of the Royal Astronomical Society and she also wrote the bestselling science book On the Connexion of the Physical Sciences.

There is much more about Sommerville in our podcast “Mary, Queen of Scottish banknotes“.

“The Nobel Prize for Physics went to three men, but the paper describing their discovery lists 1000 authors. What gives?” So asks Nicole Kobie in Wired. Her article delves into the machinations that ensured that the right 0.3% of the LIGO collaboration are going to Stockholm. See “You can’t give a Nobel prize to a thousand people. Here’s why“.

There was a fascinating tale by Carl Zimmer in the New York Times this week about the curious medical symptoms that recently struck nearly two dozen diplomats at the American embassy in Havana, Cuba. Ranging from hearing loss to cognitive difficulties, the problems were so serious that the US State Department concluded that the staff were the victims of a stealth attack. It also withdrew non-essential personnel from Havana, and even advised Americans not to visit. But according to Zimmer’s report, US government officials have suggested anonymously that the diplomats may have been assaulted with some sort of sonic weapon, possibly in their homes.

Well, we know that the Pentagon has funded the development of loudspeakers to ward off pirates with long-range blasts of sound, but presumably if sound had been used in Havana, we’d have heard it. In that case, could infrasound, which lies below the frequency of human hearing, or ultrasound, which lies above it, have been deployed? Both are unlikely, according to acoustical physicists and others quoted by Zimmer, but ultrasound is the less implausible option of the two. For example, Steven Garrett, who taught acoustics at Penn State University before retiring last year, says he used to demonstrate ultrasound beams to his students. Garrett says he’d get nauseous and develop a headache; eventually he took to wearing earmuffs and earplugs. It’s “anecdata” for sure, but Zimmer’s article makes intriguing reading.

This entry was posted in The Red Folder and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.
View all posts by this author  | View this author's profile

Comments are closed.

Guidelines

  • Comments should be relevant to the article and not be used to promote your own work, products or services.
  • Please keep your comments brief (we recommend a maximum of 250 words).
  • We reserve the right to remove excessively long, inappropriate or offensive entries.

Show/hide formatting guidelines

Tag Description Example Output
<a> Hyperlink <a href="http://www.google.com">google</a> google
<abbr> Abbreviation <abbr title="World Health Organisation" >WHO</abbr> WHO
<acronym> Acronym <acronym title="as soon as possible">ASAP</acronym> ASAP
<b> Bold <b>Some text</b> Some text
<blockquote> Quoted from another source <blockquote cite="http://iop.org/">IOP</blockquote>
IOP
<cite> Cite <cite>Diagram 1</cite> Diagram 1
<del> Deleted text From this line<del datetime="2012-12-17"> this text was deleted</del> From this line this text was deleted
<em> Emphasized text In this line<em> this text was emphasised</em> In this line this text was emphasised
<i> Italic <i>Some text</i> Some text
<q> Quotation WWF goal is to build a future <q cite="http://www.worldwildlife.org/who/index.html">
where people live in harmony with nature and animals</q>
WWF goal is to build a future
where people live in harmony with nature and animals
<strike> Strike text <strike>Some text</strike> Some text
<strong> Stronger emphasis of text <strong>Some text</strong> Some text