This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Skip to the content

Share this

Free weekly newswire

Sign up to receive all our latest news direct to your inbox.

Physics on film

100 Second Science Your scientific questions answered simply by specialists in less than 100 seconds.

Watch now

Bright Recruits

At all stages of your career – whether you're an undergraduate, graduate, researcher or industry professional – brightrecruits.com can help find the job for you.

Find your perfect job

Physics connect

Are you looking for a supplier? Physics Connect lists thousands of scientific companies, businesses, non-profit organizations, institutions and experts worldwide.

Start your search today

Blog

Science supporters protest in Boston

Stand up for Science rally in Boston, 19 February 2017

Gathering of minds – scientists at today’s Stand up for Science rally at Copley Square in Boston.

By Matin Durrani in Boston, US

Hundreds of scientists and science supporters gathered in Copley Square in Boston earlier today in a rally to underline the importance of science. The “Stand up for Science” event was organized to coincide with the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, which is taking place a few blocks away.

To find out more about the aims and purpose of the rally, I hooked up with Geoffrey Supran (picutred below), who helped to organize the event. Having originally studied physics at the University of Cambridgein the UK, Supran obtained a PhD in materials science at the Massachussetts Institute of Technology and is now doing a postdoc in the history of science with Naomi Oreskes at nearby Harvard University.

Geoffrey Supran at the Stand up for Science rally in Boston, 19 February 2017

“I’ve always believed in the power of science to make the world a better place,” Supran explained. “But right now what we face is an an anti-science administration that’s endangering the people and places we love through climate denial and attacks on truth and reality. So we’re trying to send a message to Trump, which is that America runs on science. It’s the backbone of progress for humanity. It protects us and keeps us safe and it makes our lives better. So we’re just standing up for truth.”

But are rallies like this – other science marches are planned for 22 April with a separate climate march set for 29 April – in danger of making science seem like just another protest group? In other words, could their aims backfire?

Stand up for Science rally in Boston, 19 February 2017

Supran naturally doesn’t think so. “Scientists are among the most trusted people in America,” he told me. “History shows that when scientists speak up and engage with the public, they make progress because the public inherently trusts them and sees them as truth tellers. So when they speak up and tell the truth it makes an impact.”

Stand up for Science rally in Boston, 19 February 2017

This entry was posted in AAAS meeting 2017 and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.
View all posts by this author  | View this author's profile

2 comments

  1. M. Asghar

    The Maccarthysme was against an ideology -the communism, and now, this Trumpism is an ideology against the rational scientific knowledge needed desperately for the survival of the matrix of life on this planet. This has to be confronted rationally.

  2. John Duffield

    I think protests like this will definitely backfire. The interviewee said “what we face is an anti-science administration that’s endangering the people and places we love through climate denial and attacks on truth and reality”. But meanwhile there’s this: Exposed: How world leaders were duped into investing billions over manipulated global warming data.

Guidelines

  • Comments should be relevant to the article and not be used to promote your own work, products or services.
  • Please keep your comments brief (we recommend a maximum of 250 words).
  • We reserve the right to remove excessively long, inappropriate or offensive entries.

Show/hide formatting guidelines

Tag Description Example Output
<a> Hyperlink <a href="http://www.google.com">google</a> google
<abbr> Abbreviation <abbr title="World Health Organisation" >WHO</abbr> WHO
<acronym> Acronym <acronym title="as soon as possible">ASAP</acronym> ASAP
<b> Bold <b>Some text</b> Some text
<blockquote> Quoted from another source <blockquote cite="http://iop.org/">IOP</blockquote>
IOP
<cite> Cite <cite>Diagram 1</cite> Diagram 1
<del> Deleted text From this line<del datetime="2012-12-17"> this text was deleted</del> From this line this text was deleted
<em> Emphasized text In this line<em> this text was emphasised</em> In this line this text was emphasised
<i> Italic <i>Some text</i> Some text
<q> Quotation WWF goal is to build a future <q cite="http://www.worldwildlife.org/who/index.html">
where people live in harmony with nature and animals</q>
WWF goal is to build a future
where people live in harmony with nature and animals
<strike> Strike text <strike>Some text</strike> Some text
<strong> Stronger emphasis of text <strong>Some text</strong> Some text