This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Skip to the content

Share this

Free weekly newswire

Sign up to receive all our latest news direct to your inbox.

Physics on film

100 Second Science Your scientific questions answered simply by specialists in less than 100 seconds.

Watch now

Bright Recruits

At all stages of your career – whether you're an undergraduate, graduate, researcher or industry professional – brightrecruits.com can help find the job for you.

Find your perfect job

Physics connect

Are you looking for a supplier? Physics Connect lists thousands of scientific companies, businesses, non-profit organizations, institutions and experts worldwide.

Start your search today

Blog

Is Googlespeak killing creativity?

wolf.jpg
Stephen Wolfram: creator of much-discussed new web tool

By James Dacey

Ludwig Wittgenstein, the mathematician, philosopher and infamous black swan of 20th century academia, argued that words – in themselves – are meaningless. Words, according to Wittgenstein, only pick up significance from their use in “language games” – the rules of which are governed by culture.

Fast-forward to 2009 and the way language is used is changing at an ever-increasing pace. Undoubtedly, one of the key drivers of this change is the Internet, which has brought about a revolution in the way knowledge is stored and communicated.

Now, British-born physicist Stephen Wolfram – of Mathematica fame – is about to alter the way knowledge is shared even further. He has created the world’s first “web-based question answering system”, which he says will remove the “linguistic fluff” of other search engines and “make expert knowledge accessible to anyone, anywhere, any time”.

Basically, it will enable you to instantly attain facts using an economy of words. For example, type: “proton mass” and immediately receive your answer in MeV and kg.

Wolfram Alpha will launch this month and, according to a BBC news report, some industry experts are saying it will become as important as Google.

In other news yesterday, the UK Government announced large reforms to the education system that will drag the internet right into the heart of schooling. One of the implications is that web tools, like Wolfram Alpha, could start to replace dusty old text books in the classroom – from physics to history classes.

Already, the proposals have sparked some criticism. Writing in The Times today, John Sutherland, Emeritus Professor of Modern English at UCL, argues that the increasing use of computers in the curriculum is leading to a lexical poverty amongst students.

“Many skills have been enhanced by the computer but vocabulary, I suspect has been shrunk, rigidified and deadened,” he writes.

So what are we to make of all this – is the internet squeezing out creativity from education?

It seems quite reasonable for Sutherland to warn against losing the creativity that the ebb and flow of language can inspire in students.

However, whilst the English professor’s sentiment is important, it’s all a bit predictable from someone in his position.

Of course, the other side of the argument is that by removing the “dust and fluff” of stayed educational materials, we can free up pupils to develop a creative, varied approach to learning that will prepare them well for the 21st century workplace.

As always, I’m sure the solution will be a compromise between the two positions.

One thing has become crystal clear though. Like it or not Internet culture is moving ever deeper into the heart of education and tools, like Wolfram Alpha, will start to take a more active role in the language games that take place there.

This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.
View all posts by this author  | View this author's profile

5 comments

  1. Dileep Sathe

    The Aristotelian thinking keeps persisting even among physics graduates. This a chronic and global problem in physics education, which is shaping my research for many years. For example see my Letter to the Editor of Physics Education, July 2007, http://www.iop.org/... So I would be pleased if the efforts of Stephen Wolfram bring some relief for physics education.

  2. Ender

    We shouldn’t forget what Orwell taught us in his famous essay “Politics and the English Language”: the wealth of language and vocabulary and its precise use, is directly liked to clarity of thought. In his novel “Nineteen Eighty Four” he went even further, arguing that the use of “newspeak” in which the vocabulary is reduced can even lead to the elimination of concepts. In this case, it could be concepts undesirable to a technological society, but necessary for a humanistic one. On the other hand, maybe it isn’t that bad. Maybe it is “dust and fluff” what Orwell was complaining about.

  3. We shouldn’t forget what Orwell taught us in his famous essay “Politics and the English Language”: the wealth of language and vocabulary and its precise use, is directly liked to clarity of thought.

  4. In his novel “Nineteen Eighty Four” he went even further, arguing that the use of “newspeak” in which the vocabulary is reduced can even lead to the elimination of concepts. In this case, it could be concepts undesirable to a technological society, but necessary for a humanistic one. On the other hand, maybe it isn’t that bad. Maybe it is “dust and fluff” what Orwell was complaining about.

  5. No we just ant say that Google speak is going to kill the creativity.I believe that this is just a freedom of search now you can search in more ways and Google are working daily on several knowledge graphs to deliver so important messages.

    I have read a article on http://commonstupidman.com that Google is facing more and more queries daily and creative people actually know how to maintain and deliver the content.

Guidelines

  • Comments should be relevant to the article and not be used to promote your own work, products or services.
  • Please keep your comments brief (we recommend a maximum of 250 words).
  • We reserve the right to remove excessively long, inappropriate or offensive entries.

Show/hide formatting guidelines

Tag Description Example Output
<a> Hyperlink <a href="http://www.google.com">google</a> google
<abbr> Abbreviation <abbr title="World Health Organisation" >WHO</abbr> WHO
<acronym> Acronym <acronym title="as soon as possible">ASAP</acronym> ASAP
<b> Bold <b>Some text</b> Some text
<blockquote> Quoted from another source <blockquote cite="http://iop.org/">IOP</blockquote>
IOP
<cite> Cite <cite>Diagram 1</cite> Diagram 1
<del> Deleted text From this line<del datetime="2012-12-17"> this text was deleted</del> From this line this text was deleted
<em> Emphasized text In this line<em> this text was emphasised</em> In this line this text was emphasised
<i> Italic <i>Some text</i> Some text
<q> Quotation WWF goal is to build a future <q cite="http://www.worldwildlife.org/who/index.html">
where people live in harmony with nature and animals</q>
WWF goal is to build a future
where people live in harmony with nature and animals
<strike> Strike text <strike>Some text</strike> Some text
<strong> Stronger emphasis of text <strong>Some text</strong> Some text