This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Skip to the content

Share this

Free weekly newswire

Sign up to receive all our latest news direct to your inbox.

Physics on film

100 Second Science Your scientific questions answered simply by specialists in less than 100 seconds.

Watch now

Bright Recruits

At all stages of your career – whether you're an undergraduate, graduate, researcher or industry professional – brightrecruits.com can help find the job for you.

Find your perfect job

Physics connect

Are you looking for a supplier? Physics Connect lists thousands of scientific companies, businesses, non-profit organizations, institutions and experts worldwide.

Start your search today

Blog

LIGO could soon detect one gravitational wave per week

The LIGO detectors in Louisiana

The LIGO detectors in Louisiana (above) and Washington are currently being upgraded. (Courtesy: LIGO/Caltech)

By Hamish Johnston at the APS April Meeting in Salt Lake City 

I came to Salt Lake City hoping to glean a few golden nuggets of information about what future gravitational-wave detections we can expect from LIGO. What I found is that the collaboration is as tight-lipped as ever about discussing potential results. That’s fair enough and I understand the caution. However, I was hoping that the researchers would have loosened up a bit after their February announcement of the first gravitational-wave detection and share a little more with the general public.

So, what have I learned?

Peter Fritschel of MIT explained that the collaboration’s two huge detectors are now being upgraded following their first run from September 2015 to January 2016. This run was actually extended by a month because the first detection was made in September and the team was hoping for another before shutting down.

The second run will begin this autumn with a higher sensitivity, which could allow LIGO to make a detection once a month. Then there will be a second upgrade, which could equip LIGO to detect one gravitational wave a week. This would allow astronomers to build up a gravitational image of the sky – a very exciting prospect.

Regarding LVT151012, which is a signal measured by LIGO in the first run. It is too weak to be declared a gravitational-wave detection because it has a statistical significance of just 2σ, which is well below the 5σ needed for a discovery. However, Penn State’s  Chad Hanna points out that the signal appears to have a”chirped” waveform, which is consistent with two merging black holes.

Hanna also mentioned that LIGO physicists have only published results from about a third of the first run data. So, there could be some interesting discoveries announced before the experiment fires up agin in the autumn.

This entry was posted in APS April Meeting 2016 and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.
View all posts by this author  | View this author's profile

3 comments

  1. So what wavelength range are we getting with the gravitational wave detection? Or is that secret?

  2. Capt mike

    This work will be only validated with detection findings from a LIGO world array, can’t wait…MFM

Guidelines

  • Comments should be relevant to the article and not be used to promote your own work, products or services.
  • Please keep your comments brief (we recommend a maximum of 250 words).
  • We reserve the right to remove excessively long, inappropriate or offensive entries.

Show/hide formatting guidelines

Tag Description Example Output
<a> Hyperlink <a href="http://www.google.com">google</a> google
<abbr> Abbreviation <abbr title="World Health Organisation" >WHO</abbr> WHO
<acronym> Acronym <acronym title="as soon as possible">ASAP</acronym> ASAP
<b> Bold <b>Some text</b> Some text
<blockquote> Quoted from another source <blockquote cite="http://iop.org/">IOP</blockquote>
IOP
<cite> Cite <cite>Diagram 1</cite> Diagram 1
<del> Deleted text From this line<del datetime="2012-12-17"> this text was deleted</del> From this line this text was deleted
<em> Emphasized text In this line<em> this text was emphasised</em> In this line this text was emphasised
<i> Italic <i>Some text</i> Some text
<q> Quotation WWF goal is to build a future <q cite="http://www.worldwildlife.org/who/index.html">
where people live in harmony with nature and animals</q>
WWF goal is to build a future
where people live in harmony with nature and animals
<strike> Strike text <strike>Some text</strike> Some text
<strong> Stronger emphasis of text <strong>Some text</strong> Some text