This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Skip to the content

Share this

Free weekly newswire

Sign up to receive all our latest news direct to your inbox.

Physics on film

100 Second Science Your scientific questions answered simply by specialists in less than 100 seconds.

Watch now

Bright Recruits

At all stages of your career – whether you're an undergraduate, graduate, researcher or industry professional – can help find the job for you.

Find your perfect job

Physics connect

Are you looking for a supplier? Physics Connect lists thousands of scientific companies, businesses, non-profit organizations, institutions and experts worldwide.

Start your search today


Following the ups and downs of nuclear energy

PWFocus-Nuclear17-cover-200By Margaret Harris

If you’re finding the pace of geopolitical news a bit too rapid at the moment, spare a thought for physicists and engineers working in the nuclear energy sector.

Towards the end of last month, the venerable energy firm Westinghouse Electric issued a press release in which it proudly announced that its AP1000 reactor – a relatively new “passively safe” design in which the reactor core is kept cool without the need for powered pumps or other “active” equipment – had passed a major UK regulatory review. Ordinarily, this would be cause for celebration. The so-called “Generic Design Assessment” process takes years, and completing it helps pave the way for building AP1000s within the UK. An international partnership called NuGen has long hoped to do just that, on a site near Sellafield in north-west England, so in normal times, you might expect it to be celebrating, too.

But these aren’t normal times. Westinghouse’s announcement about the AP1000 came on 30 March, barely 24 hours after the company announced it was filing for bankruptcy.  Days later, Westinghouse’s parent firm, Toshiba, was forced to buy the 40% of NuGen that it did not already own, having failed to find a replacement for its one-time partner, ENGIE, after the French utility company pulled out of the project back in February. The latest reports suggest that Toshiba is now on track to post one of the largest annual losses in Japanese corporate history. And as if that wasn’t enough, when the UK government triggered Article 50 in late March, and so began the process of leaving the European Union, it also set the clock ticking on its membership in the European nuclear power organization, Euratom – a departure that will affect fusion projects as well as fission ones.

All of these things happened after the latest Physics World Focus on Nuclear Energy went to press, so I hope you’ll forgive me for not including them in it. What you will find in the focus issue, however, is in-depth coverage of some of the longer-term matters affecting the industry, including safety, reactor design, waste management and environmental concerns.

Highlights in this focus issue include:

How green is nuclear energy? – Policy and technology expert Gail H Marcus assesses the industry’s environmental credentials

Chernobyl’s hidden legacy – Historian Kate Brown argues that scientists should re-examine Soviet-era evidence of health effects from radiation

The long road to ignition – I report on the status of efforts to reach the “break-even” point of inertial confinement fusion at the US National Ignition Facility

Keeping it safe forever – an interview with nuclear-waste management expert Charles McCombie about his career and some of the latest thinking in waste science and technology

Maintaining high standards – Karl Whittle, Mahmoud Mostafavi and Philip D Edmondson explore the materials-science challenges of monitoring nuclear reactor components

All full members of the Institute of Physics received a print edition of the Physics World Focus on Nuclear Energy along with their copy of the April issue of Physics World. However, anyone can read the digital edition of the focus issue free of charge via our apps for iOS, Android and Web browsers.

I hope you find this focus issue interesting, and if you’d like to share your thoughts on it, please get in touch by e-mailing us at

This entry was posted in General and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
View all posts by this author  | View this author's profile

One comment to Following the ups and downs of nuclear energy

  1. Trackback: The Trenches of the S&T of Nuclear Energy and what it means for emerging regions (such as SEA) – Chronicles of Southeast Asian Nuclear Studies


  • Comments should be relevant to the article and not be used to promote your own work, products or services.
  • Please keep your comments brief (we recommend a maximum of 250 words).
  • We reserve the right to remove excessively long, inappropriate or offensive entries.

Show/hide formatting guidelines

Tag Description Example Output
<a> Hyperlink <a href="">google</a> google
<abbr> Abbreviation <abbr title="World Health Organisation" >WHO</abbr> WHO
<acronym> Acronym <acronym title="as soon as possible">ASAP</acronym> ASAP
<b> Bold <b>Some text</b> Some text
<blockquote> Quoted from another source <blockquote cite="">IOP</blockquote>
<cite> Cite <cite>Diagram 1</cite> Diagram 1
<del> Deleted text From this line<del datetime="2012-12-17"> this text was deleted</del> From this line this text was deleted
<em> Emphasized text In this line<em> this text was emphasised</em> In this line this text was emphasised
<i> Italic <i>Some text</i> Some text
<q> Quotation WWF goal is to build a future <q cite="">
where people live in harmony with nature and animals</q>
WWF goal is to build a future
where people live in harmony with nature and animals
<strike> Strike text <strike>Some text</strike> Some text
<strong> Stronger emphasis of text <strong>Some text</strong> Some text