This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Skip to the content

Share this

Free weekly newswire

Sign up to receive all our latest news direct to your inbox.

Physics on film

100 Second Science Your scientific questions answered simply by specialists in less than 100 seconds.

Watch now

Bright Recruits

At all stages of your career – whether you're an undergraduate, graduate, researcher or industry professional – brightrecruits.com can help find the job for you.

Find your perfect job

Physics connect

Are you looking for a supplier? Physics Connect lists thousands of scientific companies, businesses, non-profit organizations, institutions and experts worldwide.

Start your search today

Blog

Lights out on dark matter?

fermipic.jpg
The Fermi space telescope

By Hamish Johnston

“…2009 promises to be an illuminating year for dark matter”.

So wrote this sage of physics, just before Christmas.

It turns out that my crystal ball got one thing right — we will learn something important about dark matter this year, and that is we are going to have to look even harder for direct evidence of the elusive stuff.

Two papers published earlier this week provide pretty convincing evidence that ‘direct evidence’ is not going to be forthcoming from current measurements of how many high-energy electrons and positrons are whizzing around our little patch of the universe. One paper is from the Fermi telescope group and the other is from the HESS collaboration.

The papers offer strong evidence that these fluxes can be explained without the need of dark matter — and in particular the annihilation of dark-matter particles in the halo of our galaxy.

The excitement began last summer when ‘physics paparazzi’ photographed a slide of data from the PAMELA detector showing what appeared to be an excess of high-energy positrons. This lead to a flurry of activity as some physicists analysed the unpublished results and pointed to DM annihilation.

Then in November physicists working on the ATIC experiment published results suggesting an excess of high-energy electrons — which they suggested could come from DM annihilation.

However, a few weeks earlier the PAMELA team posted a paper that should have dampened my spirits — but I foolishly ignored it, something that at least one reader has since pointed out to me.

PAMELA should have also seen a bump in the ratio of anti-protons/protons in the cosmic ray flux caused by dark matter annihilating to create anti-protons. But the bump wasn’t there.

Now, data from two new detectors — Fermi and HESS — have been analysed and there seems to be no evidence of dark matter annihilation.

If you are interested in the nitty gritty, Tommas Dorigo has a data-point-by-data-point commentary on data from both detectors on his blog.

This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.
View all posts by this author  | View this author's profile

One comment to Lights out on dark matter?

  1. Soviet Union could not reject Germany’s proposal to ‘sign a non-aggression

Leave a comment

Your e-mail address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Guidelines

  • Comments should be relevant to the article and not be used to promote your own work, products or services.
  • Please keep your comments brief (we recommend a maximum of 250 words).
  • We reserve the right to remove excessively long, inappropriate or offensive entries.

Show/hide formatting guidelines

Tag Description Example Output
<a> Hyperlink <a href="http://www.google.com">google</a> google
<abbr> Abbreviation <abbr title="World Health Organisation" >WHO</abbr> WHO
<acronym> Acronym <acronym title="as soon as possible">ASAP</acronym> ASAP
<b> Bold <b>Some text</b> Some text
<blockquote> Quoted from another source <blockquote cite="http://iop.org/">IOP</blockquote>
IOP
<cite> Cite <cite>Diagram 1</cite> Diagram 1
<del> Deleted text From this line<del datetime="2012-12-17"> this text was deleted</del> From this line this text was deleted
<em> Emphasized text In this line<em> this text was emphasised</em> In this line this text was emphasised
<i> Italic <i>Some text</i> Some text
<q> Quotation WWF goal is to build a future <q cite="http://www.worldwildlife.org/who/index.html">
where people live in harmony with nature and animals</q>
WWF goal is to build a future
where people live in harmony with nature and animals
<strike> Strike text <strike>Some text</strike> Some text
<strong> Stronger emphasis of text <strong>Some text</strong> Some text
WordPress Appliance - Powered by TurnKey Linux