This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Skip to the content

Share this

Free weekly newswire

Sign up to receive all our latest news direct to your inbox.

Physics on film

100 Second Science Your scientific questions answered simply by specialists in less than 100 seconds.

Watch now

Bright Recruits

At all stages of your career – whether you're an undergraduate, graduate, researcher or industry professional – brightrecruits.com can help find the job for you.

Find your perfect job

Physics connect

Are you looking for a supplier? Physics Connect lists thousands of scientific companies, businesses, non-profit organizations, institutions and experts worldwide.

Start your search today

Blog

Predicting Nobel winners

simpsons.jpg



By Hamish Johnston

Over the last week or so we have been scratching our heads trying to come up with a new and exciting way of hyping up the impending physics Nobel prize announcement (one of the few things that we do hype here at Physics World).

In the past we have published our (ultimately wrong) predictions and invited readers to share their views on who will win the prize.

This year, I’m going to defer to the cartoon residents of Springfield, who have come up with predictions of their own.

There could be a distinguished physicist called Oliver Williamson, but I think Martin may have recycled his economics pick for 2009.

This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.
View all posts by this author  | View this author's profile

One comment to Predicting Nobel winners

  1. The distinguished physicist called Oliver Williamson, too, may find my letter, http://www.sittampalam.net/RSAS.pdf, to the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, most enlightening.
    Moreover, he would definitely deserve the Nobel if he could satisfactorily answer, say, to Dr Hamish Johnston here, that textbook wisdom on relativity: The moving body does NOT contract transverse to motion.
    Thank you.

Guidelines

  • Comments should be relevant to the article and not be used to promote your own work, products or services.
  • Please keep your comments brief (we recommend a maximum of 250 words).
  • We reserve the right to remove excessively long, inappropriate or offensive entries.

Show/hide formatting guidelines

Tag Description Example Output
<a> Hyperlink <a href="http://www.google.com">google</a> google
<abbr> Abbreviation <abbr title="World Health Organisation" >WHO</abbr> WHO
<acronym> Acronym <acronym title="as soon as possible">ASAP</acronym> ASAP
<b> Bold <b>Some text</b> Some text
<blockquote> Quoted from another source <blockquote cite="http://iop.org/">IOP</blockquote>
IOP
<cite> Cite <cite>Diagram 1</cite> Diagram 1
<del> Deleted text From this line<del datetime="2012-12-17"> this text was deleted</del> From this line this text was deleted
<em> Emphasized text In this line<em> this text was emphasised</em> In this line this text was emphasised
<i> Italic <i>Some text</i> Some text
<q> Quotation WWF goal is to build a future <q cite="http://www.worldwildlife.org/who/index.html">
where people live in harmony with nature and animals</q>
WWF goal is to build a future
where people live in harmony with nature and animals
<strike> Strike text <strike>Some text</strike> Some text
<strong> Stronger emphasis of text <strong>Some text</strong> Some text