This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Skip to the content

Share this

Free weekly newswire

Sign up to receive all our latest news direct to your inbox.

Physics on film

100 Second Science Your scientific questions answered simply by specialists in less than 100 seconds.

Watch now

Bright Recruits

At all stages of your career – whether you're an undergraduate, graduate, researcher or industry professional – can help find the job for you.

Find your perfect job

Physics connect

Are you looking for a supplier? Physics Connect lists thousands of scientific companies, businesses, non-profit organizations, institutions and experts worldwide.

Start your search today


How has the Fukushima incident changed your attitude to nuclear power?

By Hamish Johnston

This Sunday marks one year since the Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami wreaked destruction on the east coast of Japan. One of the casualties of the day was the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, which, having survived the earthquake was then inundated by a 15 m wave. This initiated a chain of events leading to the meltdown of three of the plant’s six reactors.

hands smll.jpg

The Fukushima incident is second only to the Chernobyl disaster as the worst nuclear accident ever, and it has blighted the lives of thousands of people living around the plant – some of whom may never be able to return to their homes. However, proponents of nuclear power might point out that the situation was eventually brought under control and only a handful of deaths have been directly attributed to the Fukushima incident – whereas the earthquake and tsunami claimed more than 10,000 lives.

So our Facebook poll question this week is:

How has the Fukushima incident changed your attitude to nuclear power?

It’s hardened my opposition
It’s strengthened my support
No change at all

Have your say by casting your vote on our Facebook page. As always, please feel free to explain your response by posting a comment.

If you would like a bit of background reading before you cast your vote, check out this opinion piece by Mike Weightman, who led a team of nuclear inspectors to Fukushima less than three months after the incident.

Last week we asked you what level of computer-programming proficiency is appropriate for a physicist. The overwhelming majority of you thought that some programming knowledge is needed, with 51% saying that physicists should be conversant in machine code and 42% saying that some knowledge of FORTRAN is essential.

This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.
View all posts by this author  | View this author's profile

Comments are closed.


  • Comments should be relevant to the article and not be used to promote your own work, products or services.
  • Please keep your comments brief (we recommend a maximum of 250 words).
  • We reserve the right to remove excessively long, inappropriate or offensive entries.

Show/hide formatting guidelines

Tag Description Example Output
<a> Hyperlink <a href="">google</a> google
<abbr> Abbreviation <abbr title="World Health Organisation" >WHO</abbr> WHO
<acronym> Acronym <acronym title="as soon as possible">ASAP</acronym> ASAP
<b> Bold <b>Some text</b> Some text
<blockquote> Quoted from another source <blockquote cite="">IOP</blockquote>
<cite> Cite <cite>Diagram 1</cite> Diagram 1
<del> Deleted text From this line<del datetime="2012-12-17"> this text was deleted</del> From this line this text was deleted
<em> Emphasized text In this line<em> this text was emphasised</em> In this line this text was emphasised
<i> Italic <i>Some text</i> Some text
<q> Quotation WWF goal is to build a future <q cite="">
where people live in harmony with nature and animals</q>
WWF goal is to build a future
where people live in harmony with nature and animals
<strike> Strike text <strike>Some text</strike> Some text
<strong> Stronger emphasis of text <strong>Some text</strong> Some text