This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Skip to the content

Share this

Free weekly newswire

Sign up to receive all our latest news direct to your inbox.

Physics on film

100 Second Science Your scientific questions answered simply by specialists in less than 100 seconds.

Watch now

Bright Recruits

At all stages of your career – whether you're an undergraduate, graduate, researcher or industry professional – can help find the job for you.

Find your perfect job

Physics connect

Are you looking for a supplier? Physics Connect lists thousands of scientific companies, businesses, non-profit organizations, institutions and experts worldwide.

Start your search today


Hi-tech giants eschew corporate R&D, says report

IBM's latest crop of research fellows: are big companies cutting back on fundamental research? (Courtesy: IBM)

IBM’s latest crop of research fellows: are big companies cutting back on fundamental research? (Courtesy: IBM)

By Hamish Johnston

“Think” has been motto of the US-based computer giant IBM since it was coined in the early 20th century by founder Thomas Watson. Many would argue that IBM has succeeded over the past 100 years because physicists and other scientists were given the freedom to think while working at the company’s research labs. And science has benefitted too, with three Nobel prizes won or shared by physicists working at the firm’s labs. Even more impressive is that a whopping seven physics Nobels have been awarded to physicists at Bell Labs – originally Bell Telephone Laboratories.

But the days of these corporate “idea factories” are over according to a new study published by the American Institute of Physics (AIP). Entitled Physics Entrepreneurship and Innovation (PDF), the 308-page report argues that many large businesses are closing in-house research facilities and instead buying in new expertise and technologies by acquiring hi-tech start-ups.

“Small start-ups have replaced corporate research centres as the drivers of American innovation,” explains report co-author and science historian Orville Butler.

Physicists interviewed for the study say that nearly all “blue-sky” research in the US is now done at universities and national labs rather than by companies. As a result, small companies that have spun out of academia or national labs are now providing the crucial links between industry and fundamental research.

The report is based on interviews with 140 physicists with PhDs who have founded or co-founded more than 90 companies across the US.  The firms are in a wide range of commercial sectors including medicine, tool-making, renewable energy, nanotechnology and optics. Some companies were founded in the 1980s, while others are less than a decade old.

While many companies are located in famous tech hotspots such as Silicon Valley or Boston, others have sprouted up in southern or mid-western states where both venture capital and hi-tech expertise can be in short supply.  Co-author Joe Anderson of the AIP points out that start-up success doesn’t necessarily hinge on being in an environment like Silicon Valley. “There is no one winning formula for a successful physics start-up,” he observes, adding “One of the deliberate things people try to do in the United States and abroad is to create another Silicon Valley, but it doesn’t always work.”

Not surprisingly, the two biggest challenges identified by interviewees are securing funding and commercializing their technologies. However, many also identified US immigration policies as a constant headache. Ron Reedy, a co-founder of Peregrine Semiconductor, described tight restrictions on foreigners working in the US as “the most self-inflicted, worthless, damaging policy the United States has”.

Arms export restrictions, which also apply to technologies that could be used in weapons systems, were also identified as a major barrier to success. Indeed, Reedy says that some companies have gone so far as to design such technologies outside of the US to ensure that they can be sold worldwide. Like current immigration policies, which encourage US-educated foreigners to return home rather than seek employment in the US, arms export restrictions are also leading to a drain of expertise from the US, says the report.

You can download a PDF of the report here.

This entry was posted in General and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.
View all posts by this author  | View this author's profile

One comment to Hi-tech giants eschew corporate R&D, says report

  1. Trackback: Links – April 26, 2014 | Business Forecasting


  • Comments should be relevant to the article and not be used to promote your own work, products or services.
  • Please keep your comments brief (we recommend a maximum of 250 words).
  • We reserve the right to remove excessively long, inappropriate or offensive entries.

Show/hide formatting guidelines

Tag Description Example Output
<a> Hyperlink <a href="">google</a> google
<abbr> Abbreviation <abbr title="World Health Organisation" >WHO</abbr> WHO
<acronym> Acronym <acronym title="as soon as possible">ASAP</acronym> ASAP
<b> Bold <b>Some text</b> Some text
<blockquote> Quoted from another source <blockquote cite="">IOP</blockquote>
<cite> Cite <cite>Diagram 1</cite> Diagram 1
<del> Deleted text From this line<del datetime="2012-12-17"> this text was deleted</del> From this line this text was deleted
<em> Emphasized text In this line<em> this text was emphasised</em> In this line this text was emphasised
<i> Italic <i>Some text</i> Some text
<q> Quotation WWF goal is to build a future <q cite="">
where people live in harmony with nature and animals</q>
WWF goal is to build a future
where people live in harmony with nature and animals
<strike> Strike text <strike>Some text</strike> Some text
<strong> Stronger emphasis of text <strong>Some text</strong> Some text